From: David Bremner Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:07:40 +0000 (+2100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: tree/show remove duplicate function X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=041f60b4804d6b0e6a670ca8fc9e65dfef6a7982;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: [PATCH] emacs: tree/show remove duplicate function --- diff --git a/f0/517fe3a773cc31f330434b58477da4399cd716 b/f0/517fe3a773cc31f330434b58477da4399cd716 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..58bdaebce --- /dev/null +++ b/f0/517fe3a773cc31f330434b58477da4399cd716 @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12482431FC0 + for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:07:53 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id Iq3EnedExGyv for ; + Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:07:49 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0E8431FBC + for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:07:49 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1X6rDc-0006j4-EW; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:07:44 -0300 +Received: (nullmailer pid 8159 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 + 01:07:40 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: tree/show remove duplicate function +In-Reply-To: <1402134668-18587-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> +References: <1402134668-18587-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+37~gde262a2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:07:40 -0300 +Message-ID: <87a98bbfab.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:07:53 -0000 + +Mark Walters writes: +> + (cond ((eq major-mode 'notmuch-show-mode) +> + (notmuch-show-get-message-properties)) +> + ((eq major-mode 'notmuch-tree-mode) +> + (notmuch-tree-get-message-properties)))) + +I see this already existed, but it looks weird to me to have a two test +cond with no else. Is it intentional to have the code drop through and +do nothing if neither case matches? It seems like it might be better to +signal an error. + +d