From: http://schmonz.livejournal.com/ Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:52:50 +0000 (-0400) Subject: response to response X-Git-Tag: 2.65~99 X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0205a78dba9cb74a614142deae27a1a5e9561cc6;p=ikiwiki.git response to response --- diff --git a/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn index 3b3d1ea3b..62db5c816 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn @@ -26,12 +26,7 @@ I'm trying to set up a [planet of my users' blogs](http://help.schmonz.com/plane Two things aren't working as I'd expect: 1. `expirecount` doesn't take effect on the first run, but on the second. (This is minor, just a bit confusing at first.) - -> - -2. Where are the article bodies for e.g. David's and Nathan's blogs? The bodies aren't showing up in the `._aggregated` files for those feeds, but the bodies for my own blog do, which explains the planet problem, but I don't understand the underlying aggregation problem. (Those feeds include article bodies, and show up normally in my usual feed reader rss2email.) How can I debug this further? - ---[[schmonz]] +2. Where are the article bodies for e.g. David's and Nathan's blogs? The bodies aren't showing up in the `._aggregated` files for those feeds, but the bodies for my own blog do, which explains the planet problem, but I don't understand the underlying aggregation problem. (Those feeds include article bodies, and show up normally in my usual feed reader rss2email.) How can I debug this further? --[[schmonz]] > I only looked at David's, but its rss feed is not escaping the html > inside the rss `description` tags, which is illegal for rss 2.0. These @@ -43,3 +38,5 @@ Two things aren't working as I'd expect: > It's sorta unfortunate that [[cpan XML::Feed]] doesn't just assume the > un-esxaped html is part of the description field. Probably other feed > parsers are more lenient. --[[Joey]] + +>> Thanks for the quick response (and the `expirecount` fix); I've forwarded it to David so he can fix his feed. Nathan's Atom feed validates -- it's generated by the same CMS as mine -- so I'm still at a loss on that one. --[[schmonz]]