Re: a proposed change to JSON output to report verification of PGP/MIME signatures.

diff --git a/79/f4cd0d2293c6f43325d4f6c68453377ca287ff b/79/f4cd0d2293c6f43325d4f6c68453377ca287ff
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..06bd254
--- /dev/null
+++ b/79/f4cd0d2293c6f43325d4f6c68453377ca287ff
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7C940DBFA\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:23:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.899\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id SRU7LUMXNo6v for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:22:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org (rodolpho.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.107])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099A140DBF8\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:22:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by rodolpho.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967FA3CD52\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:22:55 -0500 (EST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at rodolpho.mayfirst.org\r
+Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (rodolpho.mayfirst.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,\r
+       port 10024) with ESMTP id JnfwG3jR+0U9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:22:55 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender:\r
+       smtpauth@rodolpho.mayfirst.org) with ESMTPSA id 6A53D3CD4C\r
+Message-ID: <4CE2E819.1070808@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:22:49 -0500\r
+From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;\r
+       rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100918 Icedove/3.1.4\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: a proposed change to JSON output to report verification of\r
+       PGP/MIME signatures.\r
+References: <4CDE4486.2050101@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <87hbfhdpa6.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87wrod9gh8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+In-Reply-To: <87wrod9gh8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2\r
+OpenPGP: id=D21739E9\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;\r
+       protocol="application/pgp-signature";\r
+       boundary="------------enigEAA542691534BFC02E222EB0"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Reply-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:23:09 -0000\r
+\r
+This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)\r
+--------------enigEAA542691534BFC02E222EB0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On 11/16/2010 03:10 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote:\r
+> I would almost say that --verify should be the\r
+> default, with a --no-verify option.  It will make things much easier fo=\r
+r\r
+> all the UIs if notmuch handles the verification and just outputs the\r
+> result.\r
+\r
+For clients that do not know how to interpret/display the verification\r
+results, i don't want the backend to incur the cost of verification that\r
+will be thrown away.\r
+\r
+For clients that do understand how to interpret/display the verification\r
+results, well, they can understand how to use the --verify flag too :)\r
+\r
+       --dkg\r
+\r
+\r
+--------------enigEAA542691534BFC02E222EB0\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
+Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature\r
+Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJM4ugaAAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpwpkQAKZtEuv4VD2l8+CvJe6HhDEf\r
+X/PtgfyTJ1hrubfkpvLCC3dq9CXfr75NQjr+oAoPwKFqBQzYVpkiQsvpjLc+5vrY\r
+nbALnpzuaMvg0soJFx3QnracMmqgHitzz3eiydQ09NJ6eya5Ir6E3fmEzktU3fy2\r
+rnMQlz/VwFTuAMyIoyCZsJr2K6S7KUw10Y4rT5EMfnysMAp+alp4mRgDPTAdcQeF\r
+ZFKLjrlOLeXj+6lRyIZwvyaiWU+bdjSk2WYV+y6mi6YZIUdtP3znJ2c+uitlZwRm\r
+vBVyHqicAfF9f7BiuBsX9oUnjGoI1Lm+6u11Xh8/8iwkgAv21gg7RCAJjp/tI1DP\r
+bPtW/GPZWUzlK82jO2wK+3R9kyBJf1nZoxq377UHuYqDQxsISEjctWT4E3DLPhmf\r
+DnungNJR0cNSQaUTUfBQXdy70GURm3X4CDjgyWn4k1echWZTXDtE35XB93dCBEQV\r
+5b1vjX8I9Xs0vVLOkp6CwxPK0Y/VgsWgFF31c+Kxbh+dRMk+SRYPs0ncUEywrsfm\r
+Rghd9eWiguJXICl7yV/eey1362lhcxg/xxlH4LDjWTzGo5/RklHaqyN9GdJIZCJw\r
+3g2x1Jhu7pOzmEzq+gEiQjiCwiEYEicAnWgMczapgQGitZsoqQeprvgPjqaqxQiN\r
+YB5WXws9KPackAKacm7X\r
+=9HYv\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+\r
+--------------enigEAA542691534BFC02E222EB0--\r