New "notmuch address" command

diff --git a/f4/77d946a630bfc43b5e5be076c75493d4fb27a2 b/f4/77d946a630bfc43b5e5be076c75493d4fb27a2
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..af94eee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f4/77d946a630bfc43b5e5be076c75493d4fb27a2
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Return-Path: <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39224431FD5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:16:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.165\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.165 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=0.865]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id W-NS7ZmyXukM for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:16:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AB38431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:16:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>) id 1XzMKq-0007Ot-F8\r
+       for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:16:28 +0100\r
+Received: from 151.62.31.98 ([151.62.31.98])\r
+       by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))\r
+       id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:16:28 +0100\r
+Received: from lele by 151.62.31.98 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))\r
+       id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:16:28 +0100\r
+X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+From: Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it>\r
+Subject: New "notmuch address" command\r
+Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:16:14 +0100\r
+Organization: Nautilus Entertainments\r
+Lines: 43\r
+Message-ID: <878uid9qjl.fsf@nautilus.nautilus>\r
+Mime-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org\r
+X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.62.31.98\r
+User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)\r
+Cancel-Lock: sha1:tGcN9OIieLDWOsPfVu63FobcfQg=\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:16:35 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi all again,\r
+\r
+I'm happily using "notmuch-addrlookup"[1] as "notmuch-address-command", in\r
+my Emacs configuration.\r
+\r
+As explained in my other message, yesterday I spent some time tweaking\r
+that configuration and tried to replace it with the new "notmuch\r
+address" introduced in version 0.19.\r
+\r
+An (almost) equivalent of "notmuch-addrlookup foo" could be "notmuch\r
+address to:foo* OR from:foo*", but it has at least one indesiderable\r
+difference: it seems considering the "CC" field, but always emits the\r
+"TO" content (i.e., assuming I have a message I sent to "john@doe.com"\r
+and CCed to "foo@bar.com", "notmuch address to:foo" emits\r
+"john@doe.com", not "foo@bar.com") so the candidates it generates are\r
+way too much.\r
+\r
+I don't know it that's done on purpose (I clearly miss the use case if\r
+so).\r
+\r
+I wonder if it would be reasonable adding a "--complete" flag to the\r
+"address" command that selects a more specific behaviour, so that\r
+"notmuch address --complete foo":\r
+\r
+a) automatically performs a partial match (i.e. it adds the '*' suffix\r
+   on its own)\r
+\r
+b) searches the given text only in the related headers (hiding the\r
+   difference between "incoming" and "outgoing" messages, and not\r
+   considering the body at all)\r
+\r
+c) avoids the "bug"/"feature" explained above\r
+\r
+What do you think?\r
+\r
+Thank you,\r
+ciao, lele.\r
+\r
+[1] https://github.com/aperezdc/notmuch-addrlookup-c\r
+-- \r
+nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri\r
+real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.\r
+lele@metapensiero.it  |                 -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.\r
+\r