Re: [PATCH] test: Tnnn-* script file name renames

diff --git a/9b/914ab1743636cb17e6e5bd587515ce030721d2 b/9b/914ab1743636cb17e6e5bd587515ce030721d2
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..bd6e1f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/9b/914ab1743636cb17e6e5bd587515ce030721d2
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4128E6DE00D3\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 07:28:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.574\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078,\r
+  SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id zTlX8OSKqNhv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue,  7 Jun 2016 07:28:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59FE6DE00BF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 07:28:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])\r
+ by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47684100104;\r
+ Tue,  7 Jun 2016 17:28:14 +0300 (EEST)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Tnnn-* script file name renames\r
+In-Reply-To: <87k2i19pz7.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <1465143703-18260-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+ <87k2i19pz7.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+32~gd4854c5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+ $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+ !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:28:14 +0300\r
+Message-ID: <m2y46hysxt.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:28:43 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, Jun 07 2016, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+\r
+> Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> Over time, new test scripts of any particular "group" are added\r
+>> in-between of current test scripts by giving them number that is not\r
+>> divisible by 10. Eventually the space between groups fill up (i.e.\r
+>> all 10 "slots" are used), or it is just hard to recognize suitable\r
+>> number for new test.\r
+>>\r
+>> Instead of trying hard planning work for grouping these and adding\r
+>> more space for the groups (manually by hand) or trying to widen the\r
+>> space for all, this (automatic) renumbering of the file name takes\r
+>> care of the "problem" for a while.\r
+>> ---\r
+>>\r
+>> If this patch is applied, this will make all patches in queue that\r
+>> have test script changes fail to merge :( -- so this is partially\r
+>> wip, but at least commit message is written...\r
+>\r
+> I just rebased the retry-lock and message-properties series (separately)\r
+> on top of your commit without conflicts, so it's probably not that big\r
+> of a deal.\r
+>\r
+A-ha. it is nice that this works (it somehow notices renames... or it used\r
+the source blob hashes to notice what to change)\r
+\r
+> Do you think it's worth documenting what the supposed groups\r
+> of tests are (maybe in tests/README)? The groups could really use some\r
+> cleaning up. For example, we have at least two set groups of emacs\r
+> tests. Some things will be harder to classify, of course. That's why we [1]\r
+> believe in tags not folders ;). Nonetheless, perhaps it will be useful\r
+> to have things a bit less chaotic.  Eventually we might even want to\r
+> support the idea of running a "group" of tests.\r
+\r
+As a quick thought is is just Simple Matter Of Documenting... I.e. how\r
+to categorize tests to groups (what belong where when there are many\r
+choices where files could go). But if someone(tm) can make such easily\r
+understantable groups (and devices reasonable numbering -- i can adjust\r
+my latest script (which does git-am'able patch files directly) to support\r
+renumbering (if ever needed) (*) in this case too) it might be worth\r
+sending for review...\r
+\r
+\r
+Tomi\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+(*) for reference: everything we tried there was still need to renumber C64\r
+basic programs ;)\r
+>\r
+> d\r
+>\r
+> [1]: except those who believe in searchs, not tags.\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r