Re: folder: search-term problems
authorOliver Dunkl <oliver.dunkl@gmail.com>
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 08:08:28 +0000 (10:08 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Sat, 20 Aug 2016 21:49:24 +0000 (14:49 -0700)
bf/cc8a770f0dfea1e1d93e8ab68eb3a1a3869517 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/bf/cc8a770f0dfea1e1d93e8ab68eb3a1a3869517 b/bf/cc8a770f0dfea1e1d93e8ab68eb3a1a3869517
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e8b4918
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+Return-Path: <oliver.dunkl@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0612C6DE0943\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:08:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.82\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,\r
+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id G-DivdFx8HG0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:08:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com\r
+ [209.85.212.180])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B392D6DE01F5\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:08:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by wicja10 with SMTP id ja10so28945010wic.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:08:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+ :mime-version:content-type;\r
+ bh=7GOfxgibu6x6NBn2ysARBn882WNGMYMLiVSMOWLVfu8=;\r
+ b=pVV3+KhuRYm5zBSk3jHp5TPk0PKp9TDnnqGTIjBb1LT4vxPXO0S5EMUIPsJwtfqJ5L\r
+ LjfPy7Ic2m5pfznNiKPfP8kuH05+UpCpTge4ET7g6OmNGGWbHbo1NGhy5iZUL6hXyHtj\r
+ rUBnD6gYVI+jq+2dqhHA/DoA9UOEKMcE4KdZAczuT8JUQSJ0mdlMBP/nnmPF+s/zV0ml\r
+ E6/QtZWFjhfWJtLmlj+ifR1qKZRUxN4VlL6fTKwrIUPeGeU1TPgc742Baz2/hX2W2GQU\r
+ u+H6ZgFY17lL1TaY6PCkx6Ml5uFZj6UP9n8U0xQjl4Y+LKhAbVHcFoLtUujP3aER7sK3\r
+ +YZA==\r
+X-Received: by 10.180.11.176 with SMTP id r16mr60792186wib.87.1440058109764;\r
+ Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:08:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost ([62.218.23.190])\r
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s7sm29363293wix.23.2015.08.20.01.08.29\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:08:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Oliver Dunkl <oliver.dunkl@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: folder: search-term problems\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <m2a8tmr793.fsf@Jane.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
+References:\r
+ <m2a8tmr793.fsf@Jane.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.2\r
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:08:28 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87pp2ie60z.fsf@mail.odi.io>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 08:08:34 -0000\r
+\r
+Charles Celerier <cceleri@cs.stanford.edu> writes:\r
+\r
+> $ notmuch count folder:INBOX\r
+> 19517\r
+>\r
+> $ notmuch count folder:Junk\r
+> 0\r
+>\r
+> Am I using the folder: search-term incorrectly?\r
+\r
+Are there messages in the folder Junk with exclude_tags? Excluded tags\r
+will not show up in the default search.\r
+\r
+You can try\r
+$ notmuch count --exclude=false folder:Junk\r
+\r
+br\r
+\= odi\r