Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] emacs: bind 'r' to reply-to-sender and 'R' to reply-to-all

diff --git a/0c/d4f4866634fa8a3482ff0dcc5160b8b0e8f107 b/0c/d4f4866634fa8a3482ff0dcc5160b8b0e8f107
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b46bf8f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/0c/d4f4866634fa8a3482ff0dcc5160b8b0e8f107
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Return-Path: <jeremy@nickurak.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC0B40F229\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 Jan 2012 14:01:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id dIZ6IwSX9utB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun,  8 Jan 2012 14:01:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5750F414F6F\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 Jan 2012 14:01:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by qcha6 with SMTP id a6so2260407qch.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:01:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=nickurak.ca; s=google-dkim;\r
+       h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+       :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
+       bh=7qgV2kqY7p+otz9oCixZSWmtUq3ElPwf8b4vVgHdzz8=;\r
+       b=MZIdDEKkVM/YjXjnXNRSDqJn3OPv6K3jzXgKSxy++x5Y2xhIotG+3xfFS6GyjiYq/K\r
+       CQ1s2zM7nMToDTBrgxjUpQz7IoA/gkqc5mUZsQloH16MM05YklsHVFbutZGwkTNwB2hR\r
+       x6zdOg/4dGwNq0IGSl+MG1yItsbdsQC/OoOuY=\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.229.135.136 with SMTP id n8mr4764056qct.137.1326060090658;\r
+       Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:01:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+Sender: jeremy@nickurak.ca\r
+Received: by 10.229.40.149 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 14:01:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [68.148.28.35]\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <f2c641e47bed1bb76def7ffaed25143071ee7713.1326058946.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+References: <cover.1325794371.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <cover.1326058946.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <f2c641e47bed1bb76def7ffaed25143071ee7713.1326058946.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:01:30 -0700\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: ErFs2dL8rqNwNPfyFRnp-REI4b4\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CA+eQo_3kr3L8Nuz3pOTeUfT-Gi2i46yV-Odgo3gmTyOmEi+mTg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] emacs: bind 'r' to reply-to-sender and 'R' to\r
+       reply-to-all\r
+From: Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 22:01:32 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 14:48, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> It seemed to me that most people wanted this, and nobody spoke for keeping\r
+> the old binding now that we have reply-to-sender. This as a separate patch\r
+> so it's easy to drop if needed.\r
+\r
+FWIW, I generally prefer reply-all as the default. In my experience,\r
+when a message is sent to a bunch of people, it's usually treated as a\r
+"forum" discussion where everybody wants to be in on everything. Also,\r
+once you've started composing, it's much easier to delete people you\r
+don't want included than to add people who are no longer referenced in\r
+the new buffer at all.\r