Re: Bug (?) difference 24.1 and 23.3.1

diff --git a/e0/55b574fa2253fee162b8fb4e458a45017c1865 b/e0/55b574fa2253fee162b8fb4e458a45017c1865
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5d06947
--- /dev/null
+++ b/e0/55b574fa2253fee162b8fb4e458a45017c1865
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+Return-Path: <dmitrij.ledkov@surgut.co.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF09431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  1 Sep 2012 14:07:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ZqwXpucBFUej for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat,  1 Sep 2012 14:07:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64238431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  1 Sep 2012 14:07:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by lbbgk1 with SMTP id gk1so2049369lbb.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:07:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+       :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type\r
+       :x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=YbYhmeGxDpWJHs4mxwS817MCm74u0lwbrursA6Mn6sA=;\r
+       b=XQqh+QNF8EklRtpfJ+JP5gQJrp3NWZjCtRc1ibkjBbx2g1ynwO0gcLAXdTTWvkEecy\r
+       nKjWdNg6tBtnPS3PNlBE9b7etxHEgAJS0BXnlP2td8T+DWOvZxN6B0CT90lr4hYFn5MR\r
+       DDPzzt/z5OLPD82QYJii6H7tBCT245QfhEUWrsUd+aj+KDsntNCrF/zjz+wnQToq4AmV\r
+       Xm2DBuBvoc7RRaF+AiZIfMCjxL8hRbhvkvzJ3o8HKYvKXYYf9xHjfyxSlajO1wsVaGDL\r
+       hYikJJH++Yn9THvJq5BeOClOOqnsalvAkLjEoaNi0eJLxMyqSzt/ZcukvcvL934h/Jvy\r
+       1W6Q==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.112.82.38 with SMTP id f6mr3680650lby.129.1346533626293; Sat,\r
+       01 Sep 2012 14:07:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Sender: dmitrij.ledkov@surgut.co.uk\r
+Received: by 10.112.150.104 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 14:07:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [82.2.89.64]\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ligvqfwe.fsf@wonderlust.lan>\r
+References: <m37gtg9qzq.fsf@quad.robs.office> <87ipcz9aro.fsf@ciffer.net>\r
+       <m2ehmnupdx.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> <87ligvqfwe.fsf@wonderlust.lan>\r
+Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 22:07:06 +0100\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZCtzaHLsjHblhE1FaEpO34ZBe-U\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CANBHLUjZq_AmeLTL=BV+zTyLUh9gHY-MhUaRSDOXdZiZU-XGpg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: Bug (?) difference 24.1 and 23.3.1\r
+From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@debian.org>\r
+To: Daniel Bergey <bergey@alum.mit.edu>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQmwa8jISkewDz4JbZuUN8boeqDmawi3v+4lQh5ZxAdOG2SHfPQyfRbx4wOmLm9V6eZnjWL1\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 21:07:10 -0000\r
+\r
+On 31 August 2012 15:45, Daniel Bergey <bergey@alum.mit.edu> wrote:\r
+>\r
+> Now I just have to get used to pictures in my email....\r
+>\r
+\r
+I understand how disturbing that might be.\r
+\r
+Welcome to 2012... at least it's not full html5 & css3 animations.\r
+Maybe emacs will support that in couple of years.\r
+\r
+I have customized that functions with an empty one, so I don't see any\r
+pictures, but all of my email works.\r
+\r
+Regards,\r
+\r
+Dmitrijs.\r