Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses
authorDaniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:51:59 +0000 (13:51 +1900)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:37:33 +0000 (09:37 -0800)
58/f7b24efff71823b7b11ab117512f5f553ca17b [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/58/f7b24efff71823b7b11ab117512f5f553ca17b b/58/f7b24efff71823b7b11ab117512f5f553ca17b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f242bc3
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D25940DF1E\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:52:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.899\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id n9S0r+G+KF74 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:52:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org (rodolpho.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.107])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23CD340DEEA\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:52:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by rodolpho.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1D33CD69\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:52:05 -0500 (EST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at rodolpho.mayfirst.org\r
+Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (rodolpho.mayfirst.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,\r
+       port 10024) with ESMTP id 6x9OEPt0FDuf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:52:05 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender:\r
+       smtpauth@rodolpho.mayfirst.org) with ESMTPSA id F363E3CD4C\r
+Message-ID: <4CE575CF.2080309@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:51:59 -0500\r
+From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;\r
+       rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101110 Icedove/3.1.6\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses\r
+References: <87ipzvk2xh.fsf@free.fr> <87d3q2sckw.fsf@free.fr>\r
+In-Reply-To: <87d3q2sckw.fsf@free.fr>\r
+X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2\r
+OpenPGP: id=D21739E9\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;\r
+       protocol="application/pgp-signature";\r
+       boundary="------------enigB9C6C062D30DBCA4ABE9633A"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Reply-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:52:20 -0000\r
+\r
+This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)\r
+--------------enigB9C6C062D30DBCA4ABE9633A\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses:\r
+\r
+On 11/18/2010 01:37 PM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:\r
+> The problem is solved in version 2.4.18 (current is\r
+> 2.4.20). Unfortunately the last version packaged for Debian is 2.4.14..=\r
+=2E\r
+\r
+is the patch that fixes the problem it backportable to 2.4.14 ?  I'm\r
+sure a report to the debian bts with a patch would be appreciated.  even\r
+if it doesn't make it into the release because of the freeze, a\r
+narrowly-targeted patch might be acceptable for a future point release.\r
+\r
+       --dkg (IANARM)\r
+\r
+\r
+--------------enigB9C6C062D30DBCA4ABE9633A\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
+Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature\r
+Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJM5XXQAAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpvMAP/jhhDpExcWlx8knfVLKnwENW\r
+d4YLXQ5s268MqM+tCnzDIjOdO1g9F2W91S0zLlOpWRrJAEETyN1GhSgqf0ROHMCl\r
+qNpG8SN5PgLGCMa/sHhwEfzoYjJ08MQTdbdDhjNjBiHZqxiUo2SKmrb7JfTDL6Q4\r
+nD/XFnHe8cPn/qmwoUWqEQocHFn4N0CQ5djGI2O0ldrrskDJZ3+yDbQz68DTbPIv\r
+clrHwWaF8A0nP9i+o8h6wGvj8ueL41zeAPg9k72/rv5qYrkkL/2x5BnK75aQo/k/\r
+sHIVPHtj5q75jJcnclX6uThebhNsq+MpyjUhNpBGbXVV6eLZzhM/3OhjD0RRC+qB\r
+fZhWlWRZqcZ2ppCM5ypTJAYCg45PHBbkbk64KQQ9XZqSB3Tdy+UyFl6PNPi0Wgiq\r
+lYnJngJKND+Sua0CXRiyUOKcG7ybjmQNc3XbVizmxsnEZfBJrn6BxyGGO3wIxYnf\r
+oNQHjh9Sl81265cM9hHo1XESG8yFZ5g9dTrg/mjYBd0x3kV78MVVbYolkp1c5YwS\r
+BCCTUhqgbiVlfTzjkS2oJIjPVDa6FLjzw9qISw/vg7ubfZE/CGzYBXbe38qCprkO\r
+AkEl8tSqOzVg+2iQ/qjT7cYQshU1Zy0bSrDwREVgTJNd/G5F5ZRog+LTvdh6Afv4\r
+W5mzEKkrX+tf5IPlMMxp\r
+=Uht6\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+\r
+--------------enigB9C6C062D30DBCA4ABE9633A--\r