Re: [PATCH] doc/reply: Clarify how reply-to header is handled

diff --git a/96/eb052bd393f24ec8e962a155fd58de6c1d02d3 b/96/eb052bd393f24ec8e962a155fd58de6c1d02d3
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4b759b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/96/eb052bd393f24ec8e962a155fd58de6c1d02d3
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907BF6DE1871\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:39:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.03\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.019,\r
+  SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id u3G0xDTeYyKs for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:39:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3DDD6DE1868\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:39:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1afc5Q-0005pc-9J; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:39:44 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 7093 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:39:05 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc/reply: Clarify how reply-to header is handled\r
+In-Reply-To: <1451426140-15303-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+References: <8760zgdioq.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+ <1451426140-15303-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+74~g6c60fb1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:39:05 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87twk84okm.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:39:10 -0000\r
+\r
+Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> writes:\r
+\r
+> Current documentation and comments in the code do not correspond to\r
+> the actual code and tests in the test suite ("Un-munging Reply-To" in\r
+> T230-reply-to-sender.sh). Fix it.\r
+> ---\r
+\r
+pushed, sorry it took so long.\r
+\r
+d\r