Re: [PATCH 0/2] automatic tagging based on imap maildir

diff --git a/8f/50cc570edda4e83818ecd9f4090ac879782f0b b/8f/50cc570edda4e83818ecd9f4090ac879782f0b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a9b70f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/8f/50cc570edda4e83818ecd9f4090ac879782f0b
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D74431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 06:00:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id yLNMgtvtb1Ip for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 27 Oct 2012 06:00:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B20431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 06:00:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa\r
+       (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1TS60S-0002OW-Ol; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:00:52 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1TS60M-0006em-B9; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:00:46 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] automatic tagging based on imap maildir\r
+In-Reply-To: <20121027044128.GB12051@taesoo.org>\r
+References: <1351208039-32293-1-git-send-email-taesoo@mit.edu>\r
+       <20121026171024.30658.84119@localhost>\r
+       <877gqc7s67.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <20121027044128.GB12051@taesoo.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+37~gf227d63 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:00:46 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87vcdw5atd.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:00:54 -0000\r
+\r
+Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@gmail.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> It seems afew can be used for converting gmail labels to notmuch\r
+> tags. After spending 10 min on google search, I decided to implement\r
+> what I wanted to have -- also my lab mates wanted to too. So you guys\r
+> think it's duplicated, just ignore these patches :)\r
+\r
+As I said (or tried to say), in my opinion, duplication with an external\r
+package is not the main issue; I think moving features into the core\r
+when appropriate is a normal development process. On the other hand, I'm\r
+not really a gmail user, so I don't know yet if these patches solve\r
+enough of the problem to be interesting.\r
+\r
+To some extent it's up to you, whether you prefer to maintain a private\r
+branch, or spend the effort on getting the patches upstream. For better\r
+or worse, getting patches into notmuch is rarely fire-and-forget; almost\r
+everything goes through several rounds of review. No hard feelings\r
+either way ;).\r
+\r
+Cheers,\r
+\r
+David\r