Re: [notmuch] Git feature branch
authorJameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 03:58:05 +0000 (22:58 +1900)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:36:06 +0000 (09:36 -0800)
a0/331877fa053c4c9f0aa113702524eb76404030 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/a0/331877fa053c4c9f0aa113702524eb76404030 b/a0/331877fa053c4c9f0aa113702524eb76404030
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..efa7762
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0AD431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  3 Feb 2010 19:58:19 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.631\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[AWL=-1.632, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 72JZycErTH86 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  3 Feb 2010 19:58:19 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from tarap.cc.columbia.edu (tarap.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.7])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F460431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  3 Feb 2010 19:58:19 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-72-227-128-66.nyc.res.rr.com\r
+       [72.227.128.66])\r
+       (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+       by tarap.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o143w96F019979\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:58:10 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+       id 1Ncsr3-0004Wx-NF; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:58:09 -0500\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ock5punt.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <87my083mgh.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87d4148s2c.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>\r
+       <4B595D3A.1030901@SSpaeth.de> <87636u34lw.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+       <87ock5punt.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:58:05 -0500\r
+Message-ID: <87eil1bqk2.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.7\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] Git feature branch\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:58:19 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:05:42 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> I want to maintain a branch myself, (where I'm the only person pushing\r
+> to the branch). [This is different than what I've done with the cairo\r
+> repository where we have all core maintainer's pushing to a central\r
+> repository. I'm intentionally trying something new here.]\r
+\r
+Just my 2 cents here, but I fully support the idea of perusing a fully\r
+distributed development model.  I have been using it on other projects I\r
+work on and it works great.\r
+\r
+> Obviously, that branch that I maintain is currently called "master", but\r
+> I wouldn't mind (and might actually prefer) to have it be called\r
+> "~cworth" or so. Though we have the problem that we need "master" to\r
+> point to *something*.\r
+\r
+There's really no need to do that.  For others developers, they would\r
+just add your repo as a "remote", which would presumably be named\r
+something like "cworth".  Then in the developers repo your master branch\r
+would be named "cworth/master".\r
+\r
+With a crew of developers, A, B, C, etc., each one would add the others\r
+as remotes, and their branches would be visible under their remotes, ie:\r
+\r
+C@host:~$ git branch -a\r
+master\r
+foo\r
+bar\r
+remotes/A/master\r
+remotes/A/foo\r
+remotes/B/master\r
+remotes/B/foo\r
+...\r
+\r
+> Beyond that, I'm quite happy to have any number of branches similarly\r
+> maintained by any other individuals. I want to get things setup so that\r
+> those will be hosted and listed alongside my branch on\r
+> notmuchmail.org. And I'll be happy to accept pull requests from\r
+> people. I expect to find people naturally gravitating to "ownership" or\r
+> particular portions of the code, where I will gain a lot of trust for\r
+> particular maintainers over the code they own.\r
+\r
+I think this is the right idea.\r
+\r
+I think the problem we've been having recently is that we have bit of a\r
+patch backlog due to circumstances of Carl's travel.  This is an issue\r
+because the project is new and people are eager to see their\r
+contributions in place.  I'm sure Carl will get to them as fast as he\r
+can.  Once the project becomes more mature and other developers are\r
+vetting patches, then their branches can take over as "master" in the\r
+absence of an outdated canonical master.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLakXOAAoJEO00zqvie6q8iEQP/3SSva8Ko4fYW1WCFsvMVr8B\r
+wh/hQWIoXZRCTg+Vr9A4qlIul3qcF88eXGozdtJ9EcS5lu8eVPBF3n/3fYtisjAY\r
+PFquJ2K8ukTPPoB4SAUOU7lPX6Zc+AjccmHs2kTpe/b6xqRRhYWfjhIJOnbyxeCm\r
+lt/9CcZ3JHUqh0aCbClRQwAeEVJMIxemQ+khnJDCZDZAlTk+4Yz7HfifRcfFw899\r
+uYHbiHEt/E45VdmACOAzOZOes46SgDo1x7gqxfuTJ6oOaPWl39XH/YW0nJlHjopp\r
+ZcawB2EicfKoDBLijTQa+wA28YL0BjL4MfaEFQvjGov60ugaHeYDQw7YA75GBN7h\r
+a+vwSRxyFC3o+AP8h6YwWxeDUv9lxWCSbJ1mXDVWQSz1Iw7R7I7URUe5PCfgsd/c\r
+zd8f/Ung9ZLT8rwaRjDr/miY6ycZwDXUxcsZ+naXXZTQvqunPq4wpoQiW6LVTuM4\r
+/+bFQ/8DVoJhCUAcRn4ngeg2mRpknOxZ6oQviU06ReOmvKl5scuGElu/RVAe+nz7\r
+e2y4PrjAFiIuj+XK+3yPkBmk1XoqFNDPjFu0voI4ik6KyzgqXMqEHqncrGFE5BVE\r
+qeY46Lqj0OzUWu2UeA5LR7oafG8GkFQcu4cok5bYRLSayrOlfxJJWqcP0UmOPRHJ\r
+odLBGU7UApYbpHecxZdi\r
+=OGqb\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r