Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ?

diff --git a/5d/f58c9de8a24b16c72d710a93563f5d54c084ee b/5d/f58c9de8a24b16c72d710a93563f5d54c084ee
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f7828d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/5d/f58c9de8a24b16c72d710a93563f5d54c084ee
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9BF431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 23:57:33 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id XxyslhqUvq68 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 20 Nov 2014 23:57:25 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF313431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 23:57:24 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1Xrj5m-0004O4-Tg; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 03:57:22 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 10419 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 21 Nov 2014\r
+       07:57:17 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu>\r
+Subject: Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ?\r
+In-Reply-To: <877fypre49.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+References: <877fyseuq8.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+       <87d28ku7rt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <871tp0ek8b.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+       <87lhn8fmq9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <877fypre49.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+2~g32855b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:57:17 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87r3wx9eaq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:57:34 -0000\r
+\r
+Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu> writes:\r
+\r
+>\r
+> So, I've tried and removed the spam tag from the exclude_tags, and\r
+> suddenly, the search in emacs responds with the 981... which means that\r
+> most of the deleted ones had the spam tag too.\r
+>\r
+>\r
+> So it means that if one explicitely requests an excluded tag, other\r
+> exclude tags still apply. Not sure this is the desirable option : maybe\r
+> if one exclusion is waved, then others should too ?\r
+>\r
+> What do you think ?\r
+\r
+I'm not sure. What you suggest sounds sensible enough. On the other hand\r
+the way it behaves now is precisely as documented; I'm not sure whether\r
+this is because of a design choice or ease of implementation. Maybe Mark\r
+can comment further on that.  I guess there are even people who\r
+like/rely on the current functionality, since there always are ;).\r
+\r
+d\r