Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

diff --git a/6a/1583144d2e6685a150f32080d2a5f50be5b081 b/6a/1583144d2e6685a150f32080d2a5f50be5b081
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..38c3b5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/6a/1583144d2e6685a150f32080d2a5f50be5b081
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEAE431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:48:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.999\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id iln48wPtUunI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:48:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBCD431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:48:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])\r
+       by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DD019F3400;\r
+       Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:48:01 +0100 (CET)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])\r
+       by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,\r
+       port 10044)\r
+       with ESMTP id m2c9qjfwt8IC; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:47:57 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])\r
+       by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6839719F3388;\r
+       Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:47:57 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from steelpick.localdomain (k335-30.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)\r
+       by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BC9FFA003;\r
+       Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:47:56 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from wsh by steelpick.localdomain with local (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)\r
+       id 1NfwoG-000789-Sz; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:47:56 +0100\r
+From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+In-Reply-To: <871vgr78lr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <87ljf8pvxx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87hbpwpoko.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <5641883d1002060727ia4e6c16lf800a92fc8735430@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <201002081614.24284.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+       <871vgr78lr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:47:56 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87iqa2y0gz.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:48:04 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:42:08 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> Interesting. My only real concern at this point is that some of the new files\r
+> have a copyright header identifying Junio as the copyright holder, but\r
+> no license information. Meanwhile, the implicit license of git (GPLv2\r
+> only) is incompatible with that of notmuch (GPLv3+).\r
+\r
+I'm not lawyer, but I'd say it should be no problem to use GPLv2 test\r
+suite to test your GPLv3 application. You are not linking them\r
+together.\r
+\r
+On the other hand, if you want the tests cases to be GPLv3 then you are\r
+probably right. Is this the case?\r
+\r
+\r
+Michal\r