Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html

diff --git a/33/2d812f1926b8eb9c795f539b9e0cc7afb92441 b/33/2d812f1926b8eb9c795f539b9e0cc7afb92441
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9f36dfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/33/2d812f1926b8eb9c795f539b9e0cc7afb92441
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB236DE0B64\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:10:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.033\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.022, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id kBdrnG7Hy8jU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:10:08 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEFDE6DE0B7C\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:10:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1adzQJ-0003V3-Cq; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:10:35 -0500\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 12824 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:09:54 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, Matthew Lear <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>,\r
+ David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html\r
+In-Reply-To: <m260wxkvf3.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <f50e07855e9bbbdd780ef925d8e2d879.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>\r
+ <m2a8miwc6x.fsf@dme.org>\r
+ <c4ff9f2c141441be10b1cb4b1e0300a7.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>\r
+ <56DD48B3.90604@bubblegen.co.uk> <87mvqatr6y.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <87h9gigfyz.fsf@bubblegen.co.uk> <87pov58b9y.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <m260wxkvf3.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+74~g6c60fb1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:09:54 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87ziu67cvh.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:10:10 -0000\r
+\r
+Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:\r
+\r
+> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: reply --format=sexp --format-version=1 --reply-to=sender thread:0000000000004a6f\r
+> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=2 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk\r
+> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=sexp --include-html --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk\r
+> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk\r
+>\r
+> when replying from show:\r
+>\r
+> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:37: reply --format=sexp --format-version=1 --decrypt --reply-to=sender id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk\r
+> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:37: show --format=raw --part=2 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk\r
+>\r
+> there's no --decrypt when from search ... and interestingly there are other\r
+> differences, too...\r
+\r
+That's useful log info, thanks Tomi. With dme's series\r
+id:1457457179-4707-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org I get the ciphertext\r
+when replying from search-mode, which suggests there are at least two\r
+bugs here.\r
+\r
+d\r