--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE21431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id jxM50cFfeHXf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com (mail-qc0-f178.google.com\r
+ [209.85.216.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E313E431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id r5so1639326qcx.23\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+ :mime-version:content-type;\r
+ bh=dA9xSFd97zCQgj7+ok9+LdA1dzCWOAKonZiAX2S6XPw=;\r
+ b=e3Vip/UVdKKyas7DmcXwzshjQBBA+n43MHYPdFsRbuNE4TUv/M3L6/iTrZFNbsgxGF\r
+ VE7tL/Bfzvpt0vSygBoRe3n0fT9MpF1F54ixanhkumGMdW/eq8eusJ9EYFccEdqZGveE\r
+ HVk9TgPb4bkf/t420XBHUe0NLNmv5hnvFsmKljZGH+DNH283XoPsHos6P6ivCR6pEcah\r
+ sk8SIHyg3bx9uqKJmEOyrEbE0NpR4gBmnkNrvty9j9PTOL/FqzyPXkPJ1cjQ9yio7w5O\r
+ /Za4oJ8YCQh5zTVI8aueI4cRzZG8/3rPn00hKNT8MhN9eYE+HIqsJHR7nYo0jjQ6x6Ev\r
+ YFyQ==\r
+X-Received: by 10.49.98.100 with SMTP id eh4mr2342238qeb.42.1381406475718;\r
+ Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (pool-108-8-224-250.spfdma.east.verizon.net.\r
+ [108.8.224.250])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm97606356qai.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00\r
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
+ Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] notmuch compact support (v4)\r
+In-Reply-To: <8738o9whku.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <1380745848-4972-1-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
+ <8738o9whku.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+107~g1ef2773 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:01:13 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87r4btfi7q.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:01:22 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> Here is yet another iteration of my "notmuch compact" patchset. It has b=\r
+een\r
+>> rebased on top of master and the interface reworked as suggested by Jani.\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> Sorry, first version of this reply didn't go to the list.\r
+>\r
+> I haven't had time to do a review, but I did try them out, and they\r
+> seemed not to eat my database.\r
+>\r
+> What about a test for the test suite?=20\r
+>\r
+I'll implement something along these lines and send a patch shortly.\r
+\r
+Cheers,\r
+\r
+=2D Ben\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSVpcJAAoJEErkyLZmeNiD4DsIAJnJCVnYjmsvf0AS9iBn/G8f\r
+K+v68wwWQNgnouPbqazpN3ODUzO/vuud8AQQJPLNNiyJuVcQMalV3pNIBdCM3bP6\r
+8pOrhKTJs8b9NJFrrAMr/iyFsAVJRoKlTdZmsdch6PvZAVe3IGmjJQgkQC2mnpG6\r
+z3LH5bQ/7yaWK9Hf0XhVv9iXzwel5fAx6Fka4wdEAd+claZScs7/OHXDAwaBAaSR\r
+0axASlDYT8BIr8kJLGUDB+qfvLKot/q1zc0QGfiurFCbhwkgFU2iVxQuVQhvQauZ\r
+KQZEhT2OZEzXrb05ZYos9NE97jKcuQu/Gbc8YlqVwTSvsMZFde5rQc4RA5jL0rs=\r
+=Ia0P\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r