Re: proposal: remove support for gmime2.4
authorTomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:17:50 +0000 (14:17 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Sat, 20 Aug 2016 21:47:23 +0000 (14:47 -0700)
de/7e09a5a2a27ad10a489a6f6cf09fef0a7c4939 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/de/7e09a5a2a27ad10a489a6f6cf09fef0a7c4939 b/de/7e09a5a2a27ad10a489a6f6cf09fef0a7c4939
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..856da0f
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293EA431FD5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 04:18:21 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 2.438\r
+X-Spam-Level: **\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id OjLAFMYYlLdc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 15 Jan 2015 04:18:17 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC739431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 04:18:17 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])\r
+       by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED62C10005D;\r
+       Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:17:50 +0200 (EET)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: proposal: remove support for gmime2.4\r
+In-Reply-To: <87387c9wg0.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <87387c9wg0.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+14~ge04617b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:17:50 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <m2r3uwp79t.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:18:21 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, Jan 15 2015, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+\r
+> It seems no very recent system has gmime2.4. I guess several of these\r
+> gmime2.4 only code paths are both security critical (e.g. in crypto.c)\r
+> and mostly untested.\r
+>\r
+> Is there good reason to keep supporting gmime 2.4?\r
+\r
+if there are potential security issues that we do not test (i.e. I do not\r
+test), then removing (instead of just deprecating) is a good option -- \r
+I'll just have to install gmime-2.6 on my Scientific Linux 6.2 system...\r
+\r
+Tomi\r
+\r
+\r
+>\r
+> d\r