--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0172C431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:58:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id U6aYSE1gx5JZ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:58:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com\r
+ [209.85.217.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B9D431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r10so5393701lbi.15\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
+ :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
+ bh=xtRpzC0rcGqY+vqVrs77unhRdCQEKgmduZCZm+mHmDg=;\r
+ b=k3bT5RLjuzhSlcVkO7D/yB36GWA/i2ro8rfBLVWryUvfjnJ0XMjc67Q1Fhro+bXFDx\r
+ A/sTfzBSHrCf00AYe7mhmlu0ty9ExOPoDmXBMHqPE7mVHCw1HplqBwkdXAwHAewSMXZc\r
+ ozytKtLs7GIO1B9cNVeQU2M8LIduqeQXsjnrWKbvo3HvWeGZo56+X7LfDvuAGYfbnc2l\r
+ nz98mxkOcqO8o2FClZD5qG4XTzGx8HNElQDL6QS+Ss3ziiFQgf3ABRozNYFW/I3RY9LM\r
+ Sle3STblqcpQqTmnFcZl/hw0LARdVKVgucllaJpXJ6/gEYY8kb3nQKZDIcgoV1m0vhk1\r
+ 6P1w==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+X-Received: by 10.112.154.98 with SMTP id vn2mr25899815lbb.8.1367258276851;\r
+ Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.114.83.167 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <871u9twrj2.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+ <87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <CAMP44s07KeL4uAChs3KFiqwcsCwWTvni6MzFGzXNeO7=sd6U6Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <CAMP44s2RuAGjJV089swpjwG9i5X=sARPYve6XZPyK7X7QwZBDg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <CAMP44s3x0m-KUN6aND71SHbBWz6S_23ZcQ-mcT+qxVtEdU+-5w@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <87a9oiw2pc.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <CAMP44s3Qyc4mNx=MotX5vUKo-xpj0fj9Qmcoidpe3AKjbjV9_Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <871u9twrj2.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:57:56 -0500\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMP44s1DeLT76kTro85cm-vCAkiMUuYdcjFM3xQiUFtvXSVk_Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings\r
+From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Carl Worth <cworth@debian.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:58:05 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:38 AM, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote:\r
+> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:\r
+>>\r
+>> I don't take it personally, I just don't see why a part of the project\r
+>> has to be treated differently because you (the debian packager), don't\r
+>> want to setup a separate git repo where to have this 'live' packaging\r
+>> (or even a separate branch).\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> My hypothetical laziness is not the reason. It was at the strong\r
+> insistence of Carl that things are organized this way.\r
+\r
+I still don't see why we need to do that. The notmuch project\r
+shouldn't be bound to the debian project.\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Felipe Contreras\r