Inline-encryption, encryption failure when storing sent mails
authorSimon Hirscher <public@simonhirscher.de>
Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:57:21 +0000 (18:57 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:56:16 +0000 (09:56 -0800)
a7/1b9ddaca12a5e450eaf3bd183971d7182f048c [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/a7/1b9ddaca12a5e450eaf3bd183971d7182f048c b/a7/1b9ddaca12a5e450eaf3bd183971d7182f048c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..33b8042
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Return-Path: <public@simonhirscher.de>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5A7431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:08:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 1.363\r
+X-Spam-Level: *\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.363 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id evkr5YGiolTw for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:07:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 598 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;\r
+       Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:07:53 PDT\r
+Received: from cloudia.org (lvps176-28-19-116.dedicated.hosteurope.de\r
+       [176.28.19.116])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58838431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:07:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type\r
+       :content-transfer-encoding;\r
+       bh=RZWepoTemTDW+qTzULY/+mFrl2PL6pPecXQXH56KAOM=;\r
+       b=pVAqMpquzIaKelEhQVTaV5nt7XT2GKOdtX2v/bEl3t/bsqUMIDq4083rA8KMYNUneY\r
+       +7gaBI9GK0WAx15inaILsTX06z3kaxusBB0fh20vxgXeVqXUPgTgqajUv6tiFuyJOO8p\r
+       0J3c2hahNt6R06piFrj8l0iduTYT1ui/et/O+1zvjuxW9SnbmofmoOCK1jMHhrasG0Jq\r
+       se9PuaHC2UxKZ4dL6aJGE4owlqVzDeKyFbIHxlu2whuGI29T4TsgTjIm0FB7FUFuHweK\r
+       2Scw3p+KqVMoMZRhS0xpXlivkmQdZgA2JgpOVuZ/sbGGm5CFDW9xCevWRbP/iwMD5FwE\r
+       ec+w==\r
+X-Received: by 10.152.2.74 with SMTP id 10mr14097las.36.1376326671776; Mon, 12\r
+       Aug 2013 09:57:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+From: Simon Hirscher <public@simonhirscher.de>\r
+Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:57:21 +0200\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAEj42wtJzxjQKCMQKZ3354oEnW5+McxvzLaM4q9Yx19nR6H_mQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Inline-encryption, encryption failure when storing sent mails\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:08:01 -0000\r
+\r
+Hey there,\r
+\r
+I'm quite new to notmuch and have two questions regarding the state of\r
+mail encryption:\r
+\r
+1. Support for inline-encryption\r
+As far as I can see, so far only encrypted mails with PGP/MIME are\r
+supported. Couldn't notmuch also support text/plain messages that\r
+contain PGP-encrypted messages by scanning for "^-----BEGIN\ PGP\\r
+(SIGNED\ )?MESSAGE"? =E2=80=93 as suggested in a previous message to this\r
+mailing list (id:87zl3az8mm.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net; web view:\r
+http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/001542.html). The reason\r
+why I think it is necessary to support inline-encrypted messages is\r
+that e.g. Thunderbird defaults to text/plain instead of PGP/MIME.\r
+\r
+2. This is not necessarily related to notmuch itself but rather to\r
+message-mode: Why are the mails that are fcc'ed to my sent-folder\r
+encrypted with the recipient's key (instead of my own or simply no\r
+key)? I.e. why can't I read my own mails? Is there any way to make\r
+this work?\r
+\r
+Thanks for your help,\r
+\r
+Simon\r