Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html

diff --git a/78/33ec9a2a8ddae4b48cb4f864ace807bc2c3cde b/78/33ec9a2a8ddae4b48cb4f864ace807bc2c3cde
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0c319f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/78/33ec9a2a8ddae4b48cb4f864ace807bc2c3cde
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5C46DE185F\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:32:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.151\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.084, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,\r
+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id RFzjZdi6ncKV for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:32:47 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.44]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE3236DE185E for\r
+ <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:32:46 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n186so96034730wmn.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:32:46 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;\r
+ h=to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id\r
+ :mime-version; bh=MyzU6+BDkPO7eKASe1AGvRprLFxjDR/4CO1YMxBdZ2s=;\r
+ b=wYnZ/ieON6VnbPekC9pnK+VNQlQogeeMlXW9ftuIqZn4hzkx+y+YyhdK+434d8eoRj\r
+ ta34zL/4Km1L3hKae3S9vddFgoNrMcxpJVVjZ97gBFsCAvAS3/ZewO2EsfreD2SspI23\r
+ x1ssbs2YNxeUpkRpaOuXKJdbdOr+6Ad17WDWaCAoMhPUh4VHWRedsrZhcgRZZejtwG/M\r
+ vGnYjhd3VUFyeOySGTciTbKVRYYwCJ6lBJtY6YMPkUhPJpBJgLYIUHYwHkoSbdfQJXuB\r
+ w3WyfEn/fIQEhjHxpnpgjqjR/DRVxIjcHfJOAgxCfCSvOD4O5XhtL2/RAC94NySEcGHX\r
+ j/HA==\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date\r
+ :message-id:mime-version;\r
+ bh=MyzU6+BDkPO7eKASe1AGvRprLFxjDR/4CO1YMxBdZ2s=;\r
+ b=XEu0zKYhhBNIwTqa3dJPAaoTvA2zsZqJ4KtFzPSTzGLj6oGr3BgPL72mt01FEVZUtZ\r
+ 3sel3mXNKeEXC9fZgmIGNGdFQcbovxyLl7f4AIXPqVGAlDyrfQoclad34HbDt8uMSGRB\r
+ gQb6KKdjI2ZsDpZnud4XTI+20wsY6ddT+KRKxE8F5t3S9kfULbZFPuLSSWKwhiSA+jlu\r
+ 29rEIIcL7WCEEcfEWo+c8/zD8p7gqdZOHhMnFjCPSRdEErLyhd1oeDS1DUdrBoNd4KIA\r
+ 3SGy0KaXmUsANWX4Hx4JmQeYRqo/nvL7+wrqWXVnb0tdXqIfV0P/ftTkUBCan2enZAjv\r
+ hfNg==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ AD7BkJKm0x3pFXsOOSelduITFVUJIHlhx3O/nIzS0GA0exvHtTBaGijGsKP52o//Ajfh6g==\r
+X-Received: by 10.28.101.133 with SMTP id z127mr16823460wmb.84.1457944365463; \r
+ Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:32:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net\r
+ ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])\r
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pd1sm21111819wjb.19.2016.03.14.01.32.44\r
+ (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:32:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local])\r
+ by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 327a1722;\r
+ Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:32:43 +0000 (UTC)\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+ Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, Matthew Lear <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html\r
+In-Reply-To: <874mcapdgj.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References: <f50e07855e9bbbdd780ef925d8e2d879.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>\r
+ <m2a8miwc6x.fsf@dme.org>\r
+ <c4ff9f2c141441be10b1cb4b1e0300a7.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>\r
+ <56DD48B3.90604@bubblegen.co.uk> <87mvqatr6y.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <87h9gigfyz.fsf@bubblegen.co.uk> <87pov58b9y.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <m260wxkvf3.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> <87wpp76ctq.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <m2shzvrccn.fsf@dme.org> <874mcapdgj.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:32:43 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <m2mvq1qx1w.fsf@dme.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:32:49 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, Mar 13 2016, Jani Nikula wrote:\r
+> On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+>> Is "reply" from search mode a common pattern of use? Currently it seems\r
+>> generally un-useful (the thread has to contain just a single message -\r
+>> not just a single matching message).\r
+>\r
+> I wish we could make it useful again. It was one of the neat features of\r
+> notmuch to be able to reply to multiple messages at once. Either all\r
+> messages in a thread from search view, or all expanded messages in a\r
+> thread from show view. We threw this out to make it easier to improve\r
+> the normal reply code.\r
+\r
+I had no idea that it previously worked as you describe. I will fix it.\r