--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FA4431FBF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:10:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id e0TR6FMZc-si for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:10:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com\r
+ [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B08B431FBD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:10:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hq4so2178650wib.2\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:10:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
+ :cc:content-type;\r
+ bh=TbYp9pGaRGx+ByrRFiM3knimujABWdMZpXqJFM/NcIQ=;\r
+ b=JJly+/XU0/8mUBWXrhSLdsAXuuHZuDQakD+6EFLqLELvxYaQf/TY9UYrKM4M91AdJ3\r
+ vXFE0XdyiEgiEgY8OfLskKSJ5TyA05cqebT2Wbdv/C8wkYCxJH7koWm2QP/WLjkkvH1j\r
+ Nl8oIBFIY+YXyHqNAU6sY4urhtvrDgK+yNZBH4Z80inEoUK/5dqFceATWrMKBjQWh1Xi\r
+ HDXfVMcITYwUOzfjUHtC58unI5H+RLtM+0HBd/tLE7C1Bf5/T9io30VUEuGdhBDRSh4n\r
+ 4KLLWM8VSSSzrlQe8lCtbaH/oHrM1yvlAMd3tIZztMuNyPW9UL106pCVoXM/qfoPXGNv\r
+ zdOg==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+X-Received: by 10.194.238.199 with SMTP id vm7mr5358181wjc.37.1374077417684;\r
+ Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:10:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.194.216.199 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:10:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <878v2rnvi5.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References:\r
+ <CAMP44s38Ufds--GXA8Q5aa5gkGWDqdhBTHJobY0qO=E3ij4S=g@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <878v2rnvi5.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:10:17 -0500\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMP44s0b+5AD9W++yap5qoPNsj6ZKFC-BSp6iY0r5Q-rX-9=-w@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: New notmuch vim plugin pushed to master\r
+From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:10:28 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> On Mon, 03 Jun 2013, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+>> The old plugin has been deprecated and moving to contrib. The new\r
+>> plugin has much better support and should replace it for all intents\r
+>> and purposes.\r
+>\r
+> Felipe, even though I don't personally use it, I'm glad you're working\r
+> on the vim plugin. The old one was neglected for too long.\r
+>\r
+>> I've pushed the changes and hopefully the packages will be updated\r
+>> accordingly.\r
+>\r
+> I don't think I saw the patches on the list, though. I am not sure if\r
+> one could have expected much in terms of review, but at least giving\r
+> people the *chance* for review and discussion about changes of this\r
+> scale would have been fair.\r
+\r
+That is true. I thought there was too much code to be reviewed\r
+effectively in the list, further changes would definitely go through\r
+the list.\r
+\r
+Cheers.\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Felipe Contreras\r