Re: on deleting messages

diff --git a/b6/c0088bc8485ed520968b8846326283f21b2040 b/b6/c0088bc8485ed520968b8846326283f21b2040
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..842fdca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b6/c0088bc8485ed520968b8846326283f21b2040
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DAF42119E\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:14:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.463\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id EBGp0nWT05Yx for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:14:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net\r
+       [88.164.105.66])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8496B421192\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:14:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA342125A;\r
+       Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:14:27 +0100 (CET)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
+       :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=hnxYU5ciHx4Hma/uPD1IYb\r
+       +3RUs=; b=EP/wrzI4yN9vFUB8fuQnH5kJU4MPwnGIudz505OcNN4f2KJd4RVWJ0\r
+       rxgYx7GQIgO8Smol7gHrTC+k+5UPjAHLRJ2Ulb+I9Qi3iqKkKkm5QYNS3Px96918\r
+       c0q2rALCxHYyUUXlKXASoRCDwwvfVA17cxVVlHxbW4bDcf6dHAe/o=\r
+DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
+       :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=UuFgGy9tEHUZy5YW\r
+       UIT1sSftNOrnCnu10n2Ovv8xSt/ywieGsExMKaefWa2xQxCW5ybBqFrrtiCVxwEI\r
+       FG8/ZPxKeQlbVYSRcJdwS9MXGiY9znMnUkOE4jnTyPMAs7+V/EpSvnrj19JgsdM0\r
+       fuE/ms9hToCXMSA1nTm4JoJOM2o=\r
+Received: from maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net\r
+       [88.164.105.66])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;\r
+       Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:14:27 +0100 (CET)\r
+From: Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: on deleting messages\r
+In-Reply-To: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:31:50 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <m2sjje3qqx.fsf@kcals.intra.maillard.im>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:14:31 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi,\r
+\r
+On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+\r
+[ ... ]\r
+\r
+> Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following\r
+> patch set implements thread and message delete keys.\r
+> \r
+> This is the last I'm going to comment on this issue.  If we don't want\r
+> to support this, we should put together something on the wiki that\r
+> states we don't want to support it and that users should just bind it\r
+> themselves (with a nice explanation how), so that we can try to reduce\r
+> the number of future patches on the issue.\r
+\r
+I think this is something every (new) users are expecting to have: a\r
+simple and sensible way "to list the trashed messages". So I'd go for\r
+it.\r
+\r
+/Xavier\r