Re: [PATCH 3/4] emacs: Add pseudo saved search to match mail that no saved search...
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:14:05 +0000 (12:14 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:38:49 +0000 (09:38 -0800)
15/acb2276358c92bbe7ac6f58fbf044571f24142 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/15/acb2276358c92bbe7ac6f58fbf044571f24142 b/15/acb2276358c92bbe7ac6f58fbf044571f24142
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..42de6c2
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49277421186\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id eXfiZTkYs2UX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:14:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CDF429E5F\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:14:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A33328134;\r
+       Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:05:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (m17.ligo.caltech.edu\r
+ [131.215.115.117])    (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by fire-doxen-submit\r
+ (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9D73280B8;  Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:05:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 191D355D; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:14:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] emacs: Add pseudo saved search to match mail that no\r
+       saved search matches\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <e599ef4e125ba9410bb7fefe3208a39079ba8383.1309244829.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+References: <cover.1309244829.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <e599ef4e125ba9410bb7fefe3208a39079ba8383.1309244829.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-292-gaa2fa19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:14:05 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87liwkxxfm.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:14:12 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:31:31 +0000, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> Add a pseudo saved search that matches all the mail that no other saved\r
+> search matches. Add new customization option notmuch-saved-searches-nomatch\r
+> to enable and name the pseudo saved search.\r
+\r
+Hi, Jani.  I haven't looked too closely at these patches yet, although\r
+they seem to look ok at first glance.  However, I would like to argue\r
+*against* using new customization variables for the names of certain\r
+static saved searches.  For instance I don't see the point of the\r
+"notmuch-saved-searches-nomatch" and "notmuch-tags-nomatch"\r
+customization variables.  Do people *really* need to be able to\r
+customize those names?  Why not just pick a sensible name and go with\r
+it?\r
+\r
+Customization is great, but if there's too much the code and\r
+customization UI become overly cluttered and hard to parse.\r
+\r
+jmho\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOC3l9AAoJEO00zqvie6q890wP/2HV31e2eRYePtUErJ+q4XM2\r
+rMHzsJe2QW3AmK+nagtnvJxHZnzgYf9Ih3tjc/PUSUIHYv8L277376oLyv2ZPb57\r
+d/ZbTXNJD7+ViOef9jlVHbULYG6op4IyZd4okkgG6g4J1u9aVQWkvLymSNd+1zk2\r
+KDcA0SzePVqcx3tm/j3wWPip3GCD9Fdl0Q2tRWZKi4vHAuZwLHAUid8Xw0w3VJsK\r
+TiKe+aFLcFA3XpvvP4EG93TFrycu1D0qmHrs+xba2o1V8tT7nXGKxoZ3AOeTZ+UI\r
+2QiT1Qg3IS21t5FLGl5Azp6cOvKpC9mfSlAmdku4rP7uEf0qDKzUD7c8ulkqpAXt\r
+p24nM2O9G/lwsOFT6yde83O2nhcrmX2sCW9iysoZGTNl2j6JRpywQBURb1SMnPhs\r
+XEbOkV6N6vHbhRXvI3YHrTWsNtb+HSRlk1xCo3WCTNH6i2hwUTtWQ+OOivUZD1+a\r
+8ADjqTv+Riqpf6T59PP/uSgGudcA5HunrHnPgUQo1A7bsY73PT0pG9WGKD9ZY4Wm\r
+/1pdzafpYooFcFuL01JIJh59JJhh+76dsDmKXnnOPWMngnnrkYglhDDSEOzprvOs\r
+LDdwnnRx8D8XaZKpFukAhCqPBmsSYmuAQD3B0j4Nyco1xBZFYGp+1N1epnT2nALD\r
+0jEzPJn30WKWXvn1WeVC\r
+=04Vy\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r