Re: folder and path completely broken in HEAD?
authorDavid Mazieres expires 2014-07-31 PDT <mazieres-zx87nvrs3vkk7vwew4gtp2mzj6@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>
Fri, 2 May 2014 21:16:07 +0000 (14:16 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:02:07 +0000 (10:02 -0800)
7b/9d6eadc8c3e644cb20e28e0cb3ee376ff6820c [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/7b/9d6eadc8c3e644cb20e28e0cb3ee376ff6820c b/7b/9d6eadc8c3e644cb20e28e0cb3ee376ff6820c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3b0cc4d
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+Return-Path:\r
+ <return-dq8fmvgsjyy73j94xyhqgspwg6@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF68431E82\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 14:16:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id SKwjliVDzavm for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  2 May 2014 14:16:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (market.scs.stanford.edu [171.66.3.10])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2EF2431FC2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 14:16:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost.scs.stanford.edu\r
+ [127.0.0.1])  by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id\r
+ s42LG8Y9032417;       Fri, 2 May 2014 14:16:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: (from dm@localhost)\r
+       by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s42LG7Ax021219;\r
+       Fri, 2 May 2014 14:16:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Authentication-Warning: market.scs.stanford.edu: dm set sender to\r
+       return-dq8fmvgsjyy73j94xyhqgspwg6@ta.scs.stanford.edu using -f\r
+From: David Mazieres expires 2014-07-31 PDT\r
+       <mazieres-zx87nvrs3vkk7vwew4gtp2mzj6@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: folder and path completely broken in HEAD?\r
+In-Reply-To: <87k3a49hmi.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <87tx98xel7.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <87k3a49hmi.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 14:16:07 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87lhujyj8o.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 02 May 2014 21:15:10 -0700\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 21:16:17 -0000\r
+\r
+Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> Hi\r
+>\r
+> Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to\r
+> update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will\r
+> not work with the updated database.\r
+\r
+No, I haven't.  Okay, so that must be it.  Sorry for bothering people.\r
+The discussion of the NEWS was a bit confusing, so I wanted to check it\r
+out.  I knew something had to be very wrong.\r
+\r
+Weill the new primitives still allow me to group my mail hierarchically\r
+in searches?  The new man page is not totally clear on what is being\r
+matched.\r
+\r
+Thanks,\r
+David\r