--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <servilio@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D3F431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 4 May 2013 09:19:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id dJ-6jI6EfXtF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 4 May 2013 09:19:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com\r
+ [209.85.223.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17A7431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 4 May 2013 09:19:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id e11so2841139iej.2\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 04 May 2013 09:19:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=x-received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date\r
+ :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+ bh=IzpNxg7/fpaJMY/cx+Hk/QPs7HEtBzZJ+wyRxdKRczY=;\r
+ b=pl79Ou39rYHivVMyDBwOeLpwCH7hyml2vZ+kasCdOxdPIS3sSrTj95cZLi7TvCLf45\r
+ gmLls3+6Eo6UMKX74elmfa3BNGUz6KMxbGSUS13viA4ASGvBG1G55KjGVA1ErC3hA50r\r
+ irsh7nIdPPqmZkEIkFDbdRAY8/AZNdoejC9PatgXO5+t4/WUhbqTAQOG6j+2ST9Lbfen\r
+ erfam8LH1DvSoNIpUlw/74z1GyxzwDHJW2Mh/Kty2MEkNA7hlL3ObYtSgxEKK3auDECR\r
+ 6spUYtr1Y4FSBNcZ5fQePLKWy7XLvWAJUbJ1Dwakwz8RamDApQ25laZI3cUqtIRqtF2u\r
+ /Oqg==\r
+X-Received: by 10.50.126.36 with SMTP id mv4mr333139igb.28.1367684363520;\r
+ Sat, 04 May 2013 09:19:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (fammed-mip89.CSU.McMaster.CA. [130.113.164.106])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qn10sm839524igc.6.2013.05.04.09.19.21\r
+ for <multiple recipients>\r
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
+ Sat, 04 May 2013 09:19:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enhancements to notmuch-hello search history\r
+In-Reply-To: <874nejrupr.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References: <87y5bwkml2.fsf@goose.CSU.McMaster.CA> <874nejrupr.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+10~gf347fe6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 12:12:07 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87ppx6lo6g.fsf@goose.CSU.McMaster.CA>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 16:19:29 -0000\r
+\r
+Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Fri, 03 May 2013, Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+>> Two patches that enhance the notmuch-hello search history UI. Though\r
+>> minor I find them very helpful.\r
+>\r
+> Both seem to work as advertised; I did not look at the code much. A\r
+> minor bikeshed is that I think y-or-n-p would suffice in patch 1/2.\r
+\r
+I know, but as it clears the whole history I decided to go with a\r
+confirmation that required more attention to diminish the chance of\r
+accident, and the action is taken not so oftenly (at least for me, and\r
+my guess is that it is the same for most) so it stills balances out\r
+positively in the usability.\r
+\r
+Servilio\r