Re: [notmuch] indexing mail?

diff --git a/36/cb64162b045fb4a1961e1c221636a06a55fcfb b/36/cb64162b045fb4a1961e1c221636a06a55fcfb
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..be772f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36/cb64162b045fb4a1961e1c221636a06a55fcfb
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+Return-Path: <aep@exys.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB675431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:14:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.203\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[AWL=-0.204, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id A0eQXjtAkhXf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:14:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 30951 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;\r
+       Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:14:06 PST\r
+Received: from samir.ibcsolutions.de (samir.ibcsolutions.de [78.47.90.66])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3E2431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:14:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from 80-254-74-36.dynamic.swissvpn.net ([80.254.74.36] helo=barf)\r
+       by samir.ibcsolutions.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <aep@exys.org>)\r
+       id 1NVTGm-0005yw-Nu; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:14:04 +0100\r
+From: Arvid Picciani <aep@exys.org>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+In-Reply-To: <4B4ED7E8.20501@exys.org>\r
+References: <4B4ED7E8.20501@exys.org>\r
+Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:13:53 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <878wc0623y.fsf@exys.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] indexing mail?\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:14:08 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:38:00 +0100, Arvid Picciani <aep@exys.org> wrote:\r
+\r
+> on the first run (when no .notmuch is there yet), it finds some \r
+> messages, but doesn't index them either.\r
+\r
+the offending commit is 2c4555f1a56602ff1dd55a63699810522ba4d91e\r
+\r
+from readdir (3):\r
+\r
+     "Currently, only some file systems (among them: Btrfs, ext2, ext3,\r
+     and ext4) have full  support  returning  the  file\r
+       type in d_type.  All applications must properly handle a return\r
+     of DT_UNKNOWN."\r
+\r
+\r
+thanks "kanru" for helping on irc.\r
+\r