Re: [RFC][PATCH v4] emacs: Re-implement advance/rewind functions of notmuch-show...

diff --git a/43/dcb15271892a631c7ad557ab69798a14b46109 b/43/dcb15271892a631c7ad557ab69798a14b46109
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9bda790
--- /dev/null
+++ b/43/dcb15271892a631c7ad557ab69798a14b46109
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265E0431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:56:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 0v0GZB4eXBCH for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:56:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com\r
+       [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43923431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:56:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by werm12 with SMTP id m12so6569040wer.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:56:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.216.131.152 with SMTP id m24mr18361769wei.56.1324972614506;\r
+       Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:56:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net\r
+       (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fq5sm5305451wbb.17.2011.12.26.23.56.52\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:56:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)\r
+       id 0B126A04BC; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:56:51 +0000 (GMT)\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v4] emacs: Re-implement advance/rewind functions of\r
+       notmuch-show-mode.\r
+In-Reply-To: <87zkefhsz8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <id:"1324553312-10972-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org">\r
+       <1324665712-2419-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <87ipl7kt82.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+       <cunpqfbtxu2.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <87fwg71tdo.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+       <cun39c7t2mi.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <87zkefhsz8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+107~ga2d0215 (http://notmuchmail.org)\r
+       Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:56:47 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <cunty4msb0g.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:56:58 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:24:11 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=\r
+ucture.net> wrote:\r
+> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:00:21 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> > Understood. For me this fell inside the 'trivial other change' boundary.\r
+>=20\r
+> Fwiw, I don't remember there ever being such a distinction.  I think\r
+> we've always insisted that unrelated changes should be excluded.\r
+\r
+I didn't mean to claim that the project had such a rule, just that I did.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk75ej8ACgkQaezQq/BJZRZmSQCeODR+qcx+l8tJFHHjkd+lG7CF\r
+Y4oAnRO6CmZrcehr5EBJka+57Aos8m4N\r
+=F7sf\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r