Re: [PATCH] test: Tnnn-* script file name renames

diff --git a/65/5ce7173e28263692e225b41f348bf2591f53bb b/65/5ce7173e28263692e225b41f348bf2591f53bb
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b49f830
--- /dev/null
+++ b/65/5ce7173e28263692e225b41f348bf2591f53bb
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9376DE0319\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 04:51:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.011\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.000, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id Eiz8oczQmU-D for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue,  7 Jun 2016 04:51:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E590A6DE0140\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 04:51:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1bAFXO-0007G3-0B; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:51:14 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 20887 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:51:24 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Cc: tomi.ollila@iki.fi\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Tnnn-* script file name renames\r
+In-Reply-To: <1465143703-18260-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+References: <1465143703-18260-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+28~gb9bf3f4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 08:51:24 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87k2i19pz7.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:51:36 -0000\r
+\r
+Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:\r
+\r
+> Over time, new test scripts of any particular "group" are added\r
+> in-between of current test scripts by giving them number that is not\r
+> divisible by 10. Eventually the space between groups fill up (i.e.\r
+> all 10 "slots" are used), or it is just hard to recognize suitable\r
+> number for new test.\r
+>\r
+> Instead of trying hard planning work for grouping these and adding\r
+> more space for the groups (manually by hand) or trying to widen the\r
+> space for all, this (automatic) renumbering of the file name takes\r
+> care of the "problem" for a while.\r
+> ---\r
+>\r
+> If this patch is applied, this will make all patches in queue that\r
+> have test script changes fail to merge :( -- so this is partially\r
+> wip, but at least commit message is written...\r
+\r
+I just rebased the retry-lock and message-properties series (separately)\r
+on top of your commit without conflicts, so it's probably not that big\r
+of a deal.  Do you think it's worth documenting what the supposed groups\r
+of tests are (maybe in tests/README)? The groups could really use some\r
+cleaning up. For example, we have at least two set groups of emacs\r
+tests. Some things will be harder to classify, of course. That's why we [1]\r
+believe in tags not folders ;). Nonetheless, perhaps it will be useful\r
+to have things a bit less chaotic.  Eventually we might even want to\r
+support the idea of running a "group" of tests.\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r
+[1]: except those who believe in searchs, not tags.\r