Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] search: Support automatic tag exclusions

diff --git a/cb/f853e68cbd4b3ed4bb6741c9344ddf83f7b8c0 b/cb/f853e68cbd4b3ed4bb6741c9344ddf83f7b8c0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..12fdedf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cb/f853e68cbd4b3ed4bb6741c9344ddf83f7b8c0
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132BD431FD4\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 8oKKebmOlAYn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B84431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DEA66E018B;\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824DF66E009C;\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:11 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 2F02F2C8; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:11 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] search: Support automatic tag exclusions\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunfwfg57uh.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <1326258173-21163-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
+       <1326496024-14403-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
+       <1326496024-14403-4-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
+       <87wr8tsvit.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <cunfwfg57uh.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+63~g6965a07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:10 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87obu35tn1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:34:16 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:12:38 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> I don't think that anything should be excluded from the search results\r
+> by default, at least not as a default behaviour of the 'notmuch'\r
+> binary.\r
+>=20\r
+> Having "deleted" and "spam" as default settings in the configuration\r
+> file might be more reasonable.\r
+\r
+Yes, I agree completely.  The CLI does not, and should not, exclude\r
+anything by default.  I only meant that the patch adds the configuration\r
+variable by default, which seems ok to me.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPFHuyAAoJEO00zqvie6q8QOMQAKJVagemDmfvsrp7PfSvsbBc\r
+t+1xjkmAR650/n8cHhk/Q7lpFjDtWMSZbpbB3NUsiCKQ0ZJ789bEfAloYHuDE4Fd\r
+u16ERHsdeldBG8KvVYL0cBdRUovHGAWkE48qwEWtZiVK6EN4aNXOK4LoFNc6DoeH\r
+tpzqDsZW5g6hJHVH4yyM1gCdFE2SgBqyBIYpUPHPLC0ujCa1clS7j9NUMDc99Pee\r
+USgGLU/k5S8rvARs0+XMXYl/Tc+8M90Y+klhS2uyIyJLQ0bpRMGqlQKJcXvrDh5b\r
+SdKpuUAfbLpeBp1p8gM9SFFBE6zXzaHJLQB0lX3xqQUTkMhyQtMq8lNBocMfQsUv\r
+mF7smtG2M7xFHDq2hZITlzEByF/YMrDfYLw7Zm3nygOxjxq6AKRCskgnRbIV0weY\r
+mY3RN3qYdJy9dY2hU6FsEE5iC3owrqvDTlG5V46uMc+8eKNly45u4qjSfNl2ryTb\r
+yZ0aqlLm6Ky4TjJXDp4sVKqUNsMKe2/8fu2hSOYTBWKTQMXmBSjowQl+sw/lFrGR\r
+HjY65df0WJVZs9CZj9/ZVHPVVGeup/5ofCZaFrbhF7ntrhw6sIgANn2RuOnTf/m4\r
+nU7wk+qM00Z3aHcwL1UCp7Iqi11frqJVQ4NyLU3ppVI9waB5pd11ISVg0vhoreTL\r
+t+Smh6cFuYbaExSbZMvC\r
+=JwTe\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r