--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BD3431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:50:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -4.073\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.074, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]\r
+ autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id Knk-1wtLZ1eK for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:50:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D44431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:50:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (geco.phys.columbia.edu\r
+ [128.59.170.159])\r
+ (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+ by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1OInonZ004076\r
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+ Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:49:50 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+ id 1NkMIv-0004d2-Tn; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:49:49 -0500\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,\r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+In-Reply-To: <87wry2wl7p.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <87pr57jvkz.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87wry2wl7p.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:49:44 -0500\r
+Message-ID: <87wry21nav.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] Introducing notmuchsync\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:50:02 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:19:06 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> Elsewhere in the thread Jameson Rollins wrote:\r
+> > I should have mentioned in my previous mail that I think this tool is\r
+> > a great idea, and I plan on using it. I just hope that all of it's\r
+> > functionality will be integrated directly into notmuch itself.\r
+>=20\r
+> I think that's the open question still. How much of this kind of\r
+> functionality do we integrate into notmuch itself. I don't know the\r
+> answer to that question yet, but I'm quite happy to see people\r
+> experimenting with doing scripts like this on top of notmuch already.\r
+>=20\r
+> I do know that I want to do thing to make such scripting easier,\r
+> (independent of whether the current functionality gets folded into\r
+> notmuch).\r
+\r
+Hey, Carl. Yeah, this was an old post and there's been lots of\r
+discussion about it. I'm certainly more flexible about my position now\r
+than I think I was originally.\r
+\r
+In fact, I actually gave up on syncing notmuch and maildir, and am\r
+basically punting on maildir altogether. This is slightly problematic\r
+because notmuch is still missing some key features so I occasionally\r
+have to use other mailers to achieve certain things (especially OpenPGP\r
+stuff). I worry about it down the line as well, if I ever have to use\r
+another mailer for any reason. All mail I've received since my switch\r
+to notmuch will show up as "unread" in maildir readers.\r
+\r
+I think notmuch wrapper scripts like notmuchsync are going to be crucial\r
+for notmuch down the line, so I definitely agree that doing everything\r
+possible to make it easier for them is a very good thing. I am using\r
+notmuchsync for deleting "delete" tagged messages, for which it's very\r
+useful. It's pretty slow, though, which I've been chalking up to the\r
+fact that it has to parse the notmuch "show" output. Once notmuch can\r
+output just the paths to messages matching search results that should\r
+get much much faster.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLhXTJAAoJEO00zqvie6q8rysQAJJU2uSJoYm1mMrpB2x+Zz1+\r
+APht2VA/xAGdOMipOOhtGkufdgyGpaA9zVJHWBRZe7Y8LkxKJN/C7cm3M6aYWp8F\r
+s4Nw25oqAE7GbpNIkPBq67HWZQzMhxxRDO3+ehj+AxCrjIFRaox2jvDx4QCQonxU\r
+kln4unTiMwjoJX66kvGqDNX7Tb1XIHZsmbjR0kq3YDrtU5CqOP7AcChqNfiLhIKB\r
+pedLg8NzkiywbhVMrsHPLhf+QO1+5F71g/1JK8WlfRYtVC29sz5JJpd05UMzu3jY\r
+rcqpRxy0+1EdCOshOX1XS7Jm4dQsHsnphziSW+0lSgIEaLWTEMOZ3WDIRB+t7FQo\r
+X5/EZzUvvHYr2B+xqERMeZlBG/5Or9fzq2bAOu+EhVDoAzUh0rGYvH+p8Dx3TwQr\r
+uGCyduBpJDtwqeAXiL/HW3lnFOiWzJtMo1Kc0HXreZhZqjs1qA5Cg0mbxpmu2yEd\r
+220/iwnS/Gd/VubASbzbCWju3xx3k3x1Xix6zxmfOn8FW+H1xoL2Pc49lu9XpyAr\r
+WlgdmkbK92YcFTYyvxKEKccMYJaflJUN50SN0+6hgVgCFlnpY8re1egy87T3vmBF\r
+bdq65Vp39MJAzJ7Sri31oZc3QzaHEXmVCrkiJoNZrUUTmynghFDtYHblP+6mETUU\r
+mIBkwPQLwNAAySXRQNje\r
+=SNRu\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff