Re: [PATCH] libnotmuch: fix typos in CLEAN setting, add file

diff --git a/0e/87beda381a7ed46e9daf0f44f41fa2b98df6a5 b/0e/87beda381a7ed46e9daf0f44f41fa2b98df6a5
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..96e2d40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/0e/87beda381a7ed46e9daf0f44f41fa2b98df6a5
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D880D429E2A\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.01\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id AxkwUR3AFuE3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4AE429E25\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047F529A645;\r
+       Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:55:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id E3CB8254157; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:55:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+To: david@tethera.net, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] libnotmuch: fix typos in CLEAN setting, add file\r
+In-Reply-To: <1309005958-10409-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+References: <87aad7ce2w.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <1309005958-10409-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:55:20 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87liwlaiqv.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:55:41 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:45:58 -0300, david@tethera.net wrote:\r
+> Here is an updated version.\r
+\r
+Thanks. I've committed this now, (waiting to be pushed until I fix my\r
+build---the symbols stuff---so I can actually run "make test" again).\r
+\r
+> I'm not sure the best way to do a test of\r
+> the cleaning; maybe we should ship a MANIFEST file containing the\r
+> output of git ls-files. I'm not sure how much churn this would cause\r
+> in git.  Perhaps it could be treated like version, and generated from\r
+> git if possible.\r
+\r
+Definitely wouldn't want a generated file under revision control. It\r
+would be possible to just run "git ls-files" if we're in a git\r
+repository and skip the test otherwise. Or...\r
+\r
+> In any case I guess this couldn't really be part of\r
+> our regular test suite, because all the other tests would fail ;).\r
+\r
+Heh, that would be a bad failure mode. :-)\r
+\r
+The typical way to do this (as far as I understand) is as part of "make\r
+distcheck". The idea there is to make a tar file; verify that the tar\r
+file can be unpacked, configured, built, and installed; and then to\r
+verify that "make distclean" returns the directory to the same state as\r
+just after having unpacked the tar file.\r
+\r
+I'm not really all that concerned about it though. We don't add/remove\r
+files all that often, and it's generally not too bad of a failure mode\r
+if "make clean" isn't perfect.\r
+\r
+So if someone added testing for this, that would be fine, but it's not a\r
+high priority for me.\r
+\r
+=2DCarl\r
+\r
+=2D-=20\r
+carl.d.worth@intel.com\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk4KI5gACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWgTggCffKQMyprVvAEaVSM01vXZ/SQV\r
+VzIAn2eO7IBwOU3DZ3UhimrpcRsEwdor\r
+=P/8j\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r