Re: Bug/Issue: References header doesn't wrap in emacs package

diff --git a/bf/68746fe7589d04cf38a73eb9ecf62c6a25a861 b/bf/68746fe7589d04cf38a73eb9ecf62c6a25a861
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b7cc280
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bf/68746fe7589d04cf38a73eb9ecf62c6a25a861
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Return-Path: <Sanjoy.Mahajan@olin.edu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E2B6DE0130\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 20:06:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.006\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005,\r
+  RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id zwD0L0vOapIH for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon,  6 Jun 2016 20:05:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 901 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at arlo;\r
+ Mon, 06 Jun 2016 20:05:52 PDT\r
+Received: from EXCAS04.olin.edu (excas04.olin.edu [208.91.55.40])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1FC16DE00DA\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 20:05:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from insight.mit.edu (108.20.254.101) by EX03.olin.edu (10.1.15.11)\r
+ with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5;\r
+ Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:50:49 -0400\r
+Received: from sanjoy by insight.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.87)\r
+ (envelope-from <sanjoy@olin.edu>)\r
+ id 1bA76L-00046X-K8; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:50:45 -0400\r
+From: Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@olin.edu>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Allan Streib <astreib@indiana.edu>,\r
+ <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: Bug/Issue: References header doesn't wrap in emacs package\r
+In-Reply-To: <878u7k21d8.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <87612qwh04.fsf@viking.dsc.soic.indiana.edu>\r
+ <87si5t1nhu.fsf@zancas.localnet> <878u7k21d8.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:50:45 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87d1ntg1a2.fsf@insight.mit.edu>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Originating-IP: [108.20.254.101]\r
+X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCAS03.olin.edu (10.1.15.15) To EX03.olin.edu (10.1.15.11)\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 03:06:01 -0000\r
+\r
+On 2015-10-02 21:21, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+\r
+>>> The problem is a References header that is too long/not wrapped.\r
+>>>\r
+>>\r
+>> Hi Allan;\r
+>>\r
+>> Thanks for the report.  I can see how notmuch-reply would generate a\r
+>> long references header in that situation. We rely on message-mode (part\r
+>> of Gnus) to actually send the message, and it isn't clear to me yet if\r
+>> message-mode (or some function it invokes) normally folds long headers.\r
+>\r
+> I have reported this as an emacs bug.\r
+>\r
+>   http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21608\r
+\r
+I'm not sure whether fixing it in emacs is right.  The command 'notmuch\r
+reply' is itself (with the sexp or json formats) generating the too-long\r
+References: header.  Shouldn't it generate an RFC-compliant message?\r
+\r
+Or should the json/sexp formats remain agnostic about line length,\r
+because wrapping doesn't make sense with key/value pairs?  In that case,\r
+I agree that message-mode should fix any long lines.\r
+\r
+By the way, the latest Exim release (4.87), at least as configured in\r
+Debian, does limit lines to 998 characters, and that limit has been\r
+causing me a few hiccups -- usually when I reply to a message sent by\r
+gmail with a zillion references (perhaps it lists every message in the\r
+thread).\r
+\r
+-Sanjoy\r