--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B4C6DE01BE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:50:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.011\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.000, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id emB-8hsMRKLr for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:50:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93256DE0130\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:50:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1bBKxI-0001MI-Kh; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:50:28 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 436 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:50:39 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] WIP: regexp matching in 'subject' and 'from'\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2r3c5ti1c.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <1465265149-7174-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+ <1465525688-30913-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+ <87d1npydc2.fsf@zancas.localnet> <m2r3c5ti1c.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+28~gb9bf3f4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:50:39 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87ziqtw9dc.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:50:52 -0000\r
+\r
+Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Fri, Jun 10 2016, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+>\r
+>> David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+>> and of course everywhere it says #ifdef HAVE_XAPIAN_FIELD_PROCESSOR, is\r
+>> should say #if.\r
+>\r
+> ... is there a static code analyzer which notices such a mistakes... ?\r
+\r
+It seems tough for a static analyzer, because the bug is really in\r
+misunderstanding the build system (which always defines that symbol)\r
+rather than the code itself.\r
+\r
+d\r