Re: [notmuch] Threading

diff --git a/51/79b08b60026f1f037993e65af427a4acc8388d b/51/79b08b60026f1f037993e65af427a4acc8388d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..695c600
--- /dev/null
+++ b/51/79b08b60026f1f037993e65af427a4acc8388d
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F83431FBC;\r
+       Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:16:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 18abKxjFBGc1; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:16:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB4A431FAE;\r
+       Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:16:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 0141F2542FF; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+To: Mark Anderson <markr.anderson@amd.com>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+In-Reply-To: <1260400470-sup-5775@testarossa>\r
+References: <1260400470-sup-5775@testarossa>\r
+Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:48 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87ws0ug23f.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] Threading\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:16:36 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:21:34 -0700, Mark Anderson <markr.anderson@amd.com> wrote:\r
+> I was wondering if there's a way in notmuch to group un-associated\r
+> threads into a single thread.\r
+\r
+There's certainly nothing like that in notmuch currently.\r
+\r
+Sup had user-level functionality in the interface for stitching messages\r
+into a single thread, and I definitely think that that doesn't make any\r
+sense.\r
+\r
+> I have a bug tracking system that doesn't give me emails that thread naturally in notmuch.\r
+\r
+I've seen similar things. Bugzilla emails at least all group into a\r
+single thread in notmuch, but don't get nested correctly at all, and\r
+that's really annoying.\r
+\r
+> I wouldn't mind writing a filter that could help identify a thread id\r
+> which should apply to a message, and suggest that to notmuch.\r
+\r
+I think the right answer here is to fix the input that notmuch is\r
+getting. Just ensure that each message has a proper In-Reply-To header\r
+and all should be fine. If you can't fix the bug-tracking system to emit\r
+proper email, can you apply your filter and rewrite the message as part\r
+of delivery (before notmuch sees it)?\r
+\r
+-Carl\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iD8DBQFLITJl6JDdNq8qSWgRAqjzAKCnCZsa7lTzORmfKbBrQmppkwXnDgCdHdtL\r
+52r8Bi4++WdJfuG7UiP1NjQ=\r
+=vbuu\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r