--- /dev/null
+To convince yourself of this, consider the output of
+
+cd ~/rsrch/data/z_piezo_calib (should be rsrch/data/calibcant)
+for X in A B C D; do
+ cc_analyze.py -b `cc_bump_analyze.py -ct 20080919_cant${X}_tweak.bump`
+ -t `cc_T_analyze.py -ct 20080919_cant${X}_tweak.Ts `
+ -v `cc_vib_analyze.py -ct 20080919_cant${X}_tweak.vib -p`
+ --verbose --plot-inputs
+done
+
+The Q for cantilever D is so low it's hard to see resonance at all,
+but it looks like at least 25 kHz. For cantilever A, it's the ?second
+resonance? by then. Not the first anyway.
+
+Hmm... The tweakfiles are actually working fine, we just need to keep
+scripts "20080919_cant_analyze.sh" with the target files and freq ranges.
+Much better solution, but don't forget about it ;p.
--- /dev/null
+
+
+
+creator=W. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+severity=minor
+
+
+
+
+
+
+status=fixed
+
+
+
+
+
+
+summary=Need min/max frequency ranges in vib tweakfiles
+
+
+
+
+
+
+time=Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:56:56 +0000
+
+
+