close, cannot reproduce

Perhaps fil will come back here and give details.

diff --git a/doc/bugs/bug_in_cgiurl_port.mdwn b/doc/bugs/bug_in_cgiurl_port.mdwn
index 4a7dd21b6a41a9bf9ddedbeca0a6917459194c34..dbe7103995c0a1317a40ae6a00513f9115dfb361 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/bug_in_cgiurl_port.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/bug_in_cgiurl_port.mdwn
@@ -2,3 +2,8 @@ I think there's a bug in the code that determines if the cgiurl is relative
 to the url. If one has a different port than the other, they're not
 relative, and I hear Fil encountered an issue where the wrong port was then
 used. --[[Joey]] 
+
+> I tested, setting cgiurl to a nonstandard port. After rebuilding,
+> pages used the full url. So I don't see a bug here, or am missing
+> something from my memory of the report (which was done the bad way, on
+> IRC). [[done]] --[[Joey]]