Re: [PATCH] lib: fix memory leak of field processor objects

diff --git a/e8/814e6b06c85f5be5bea08b44db49715e4caa89 b/e8/814e6b06c85f5be5bea08b44db49715e4caa89
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4b897e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/e8/814e6b06c85f5be5bea08b44db49715e4caa89
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F306DE01C2\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:22:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.011\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.000, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id QfL3-ofLlfmH for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627666DE01BE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1bBlfc-0005El-5M; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:22:00 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 25476 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:22:11 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: fix memory leak of field processor objects\r
+In-Reply-To: <1465526268-9522-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+References: <1465526268-9522-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+28~gb9bf3f4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 13:22:11 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <8737ojwv9o.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:22:23 -0000\r
+\r
+David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> The field processor objects need to be deallocated explicitly just like\r
+> the range processors (or a talloc destructor defined).\r
+\r
+pushed to master\r
+\r
+d\r