Re: [PATCH] emacs: tree: mark read change

diff --git a/d4/64a5210e5e9315da09869b8bf41009d991ba57 b/d4/64a5210e5e9315da09869b8bf41009d991ba57
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4e9faee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/d4/64a5210e5e9315da09869b8bf41009d991ba57
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3B96DE0298\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:33:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.18\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.18 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 7xngYn-58THb for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:33:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net\r
+ [87.98.215.224])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9EA06DE028A\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:33:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim\r
+ 4.80) (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1Z7UrN-0006FM-0J; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:31:57 +0000\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 16804 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 23 Jun 2015\r
+ 20:31:38 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: tree: mark read change\r
+In-Reply-To: <1433843467-32398-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+References: <1433843467-32398-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.1+2~g5e37568 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 22:31:38 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87si9iyxn9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:33:33 -0000\r
+\r
+Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> The mark read code for tree mode did not get updated in the recent\r
+> changes. This updates it to match. Since the user can customize the\r
+> mark read logic we just call the show logic in the message pane.\r
+> ---\r
+>\r
+> An alternative would be to mark any message explicitly viewed in\r
+> tree-mode as read. That would be simpler but I think this is better as\r
+> it deals with user customized mark read functions -- for example if\r
+> the user has a customized function that only marks a message read if\r
+> the whole message is viewed then this version will do the same in tree\r
+> mode.\r
+\r
+At first I was leery of the chaining of hooks, but now that I\r
+noticed/experienced the bug, it makes more sense to me.  I'm considering\r
+rolling a bug fix release with this (I imagine the bug is pretty\r
+annoying for people using only notmuch-tree), so I'd like a bit more\r
+feedback before merging it.\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r
+\r