Re: [PATCH] emacs: sign/encrypt replies to signed/encrypted messages

diff --git a/db/2025df200fc7206bf693271147099264f5c831 b/db/2025df200fc7206bf693271147099264f5c831
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..de601fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/db/2025df200fc7206bf693271147099264f5c831
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BA5431FCB\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id wAXCL8NBpWv4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E235431FC9\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1632A32810C;\r
+       Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:47 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-107-185-189-81.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [107.185.189.81]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7155328184;\r
+       Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 7FA8C60123; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: sign/encrypt replies to signed/encrypted messages\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAB+hUn9YeDY0u4+1=ru6VZVBJar4YfAK=nhORLhOO0EmyO2K_g@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <87a9f1c8aq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <1396689486-19232-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <8738hf25pa.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <CAB+hUn9YeDY0u4+1=ru6VZVBJar4YfAK=nhORLhOO0EmyO2K_g@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+197~g37a1196 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:40 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87lhv7sr9z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:24:57 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> On Apr 14, 2014 10:17 AM, "David Bremner" <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+>>\r
+>> Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:\r
+>> > +(defun notmuch-mua-reply-crypto (parts)\r
+>> > +  (loop for part in parts\r
+>> > +     if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get part :content-type)\r
+> "multipart/signed")\r
+>> > +       do (mml-secure-message-sign)\r
+>>\r
+>> How do people feel about disabling/removing the previous two lines?\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> I'd be fine with that (see the commit message).\r
+\r
+I'd be fine with that as well.  I auto-sign all outgoing mail regardless\r
+of the signature status of what I'm replying to, so that's fine.\r
+Auto-encrypting replies to encrypted mail is actually a security issue,\r
+whereas auto-signing is not, so as long as we have the auto-encrypting\r
+always enabled that should ok.\r
+\r
+David, did you want to handle the patch?  If not let me know and I'll do\r
+it.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTTCfoAAoJEO00zqvie6q8+aYP/3Q/1DGHJ5A7KD6Io3XNIdEC\r
+yrcHOzzWOiiEbKaheThvKvVc9tf/QwG8OLvFciPx78xORHETA0MJ5Cw+HPHurRY8\r
+rNSLuaZbsLu0wwEC9TX+vdc53GzTbB1HtfkhYUVPE01OfERpSrLOvm4ytj7TWWwa\r
+h556/427oLh0SA31UeVtTDvJFS95uWK3VKBUjfwFT58KsTGGlxRmoqchGsnvy9Aq\r
+SLnB06TLE7Jn42VzHViZ3NlMrcN1SEu+QDGdtrnqumTN63eFZZ/FLDHKYKiWACvZ\r
+qHaoU7pT8BcOlOzNpYRnab6+9xOfkFzGseyusTVURpxOOjiAezlWcE58n1nKIqdf\r
+49tYfXjLhJrFWGonmxbzeZwMNPiJvTFUIoOcRYPosXg0mhr+nG7jpnTOiG97Nolj\r
+qTUSLYig6TvJoAO1f5uE3l9JhdAcaiUcj3Pma21l34VgedDs1Jnc/23IndhderVw\r
+Es+8HdWPZrBiufMg4Qz42x932XbLu8nvieXJoZZK8SrN0xKOjxmsb/8i2Snoq2QU\r
+8lRyHULf4ZwjIxg9TDjGKxgsYqQ6jWZvXVioGliPSkeTjCC2HyRrrZ1Omnc2oK6e\r
+Sz/632J2IqlB/uWCqqU6vkgOwmcQ5tZ+KK7t37bhXFXOMMZTw7fkjCUchBd7tfu1\r
+51CTI0+XSvjPzQjlstOc\r
+=QIfq\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r