Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] emacs: show: redesign unread/read logic

diff --git a/ec/ab905f5428f8c15862550ac97d8f1ec3f86a8e b/ec/ab905f5428f8c15862550ac97d8f1ec3f86a8e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ccd12a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ec/ab905f5428f8c15862550ac97d8f1ec3f86a8e
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A592431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 04:29:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 3.001\r
+X-Spam-Level: ***\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id GSFW1N+n+v9h for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  9 May 2014 04:28:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC98431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 04:28:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1Wiiyz-0005gO-5v; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:28:53 +0100\r
+Received: from 5751dfa2.skybroadband.com ([87.81.223.162] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1Wiiyy-00034k-RV; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:28:53 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2]  emacs: show: redesign unread/read logic\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunlhubcq6e.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <1399594808-2815-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+       <cunlhubcq6e.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+615~g78e3a93 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:28:51 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87d2fnmbrg.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 87.81.223.162\r
+X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc,\r
+       this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB).\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 6040852ddba9712bacda32d8ffd41e75 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.5\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored 0.5 points. Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       *  1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails\r
+       * -0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 11:29:07 -0000\r
+\r
+On Fri, 09 May 2014, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> On Fri, May 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote:\r
+>> This is v4 of this set. v3 is at id:1395777793-13297-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com\r
+>>\r
+>> David (dme) was not keen on the logic in the previous patch so I have\r
+>> tried to make it rather more customisable and made this version much\r
+>> closer to the existing logic.\r
+>>\r
+>> This version marks the current message read if it is open. It doesn't\r
+>> care how you get there: whether it is notmuch commands n/N/p/P next\r
+>> message etc, emacs commands like scroll up, mouse clicks etc.\r
+>>\r
+>> The only proviso is it will only mark a message read once (in a single\r
+>> buffer and between refreshes) as otherwise it is impossible for a user\r
+>> to choose to mark a message unread.\r
+>\r
+> This version looks good to me, thanks for considering the feedback.\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+Thanks for looking and testing.\r
+\r
+>> I, personally, like my previous logic much more. But with this setup\r
+>> that can be customized easily in my .emacs (we may choose to add other\r
+>> options into mainline later). Also I think this series fixes all of\r
+>> the problems with the current read/unread logic mentioned in\r
+>> id:87a9atmpkf.fsf@qmul.ac.uk are fixed.\r
+>\r
+> Just to confirm: you can get your desired behaviour by writing an\r
+> alternative `notmuch-show-mark-read-function'?\r
+\r
+Yes I can confirm that. So if this went in I can get the behaviour of\r
+the earlier series without needing to patch notmuch.\r
+\r
+We can decide later if we want to include it (and other possible mark\r
+read functions) as an option, or as a contrib file, or just on the wiki.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r