Re: [PATCH 0/5] Move pick into mainline

diff --git a/7a/b8a2b97ea3f00615c7e5d389ce03c46729d876 b/7a/b8a2b97ea3f00615c7e5d389ce03c46729d876
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a0e10d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/7a/b8a2b97ea3f00615c7e5d389ce03c46729d876
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B19C431FC3\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:27:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id bD9qYLUWoyCP for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:26:55 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89AB2431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:26:55 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1Va08x-0003Mu-Pv; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:26:52 +0100\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1Va08x-0002xx-I7; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:26:51 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Move pick into mainline\r
+In-Reply-To: <1382257699-29860-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+References: <1382257699-29860-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:26:49 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87wql0757q.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 5cf06274c480fd6291bcf24c42f5d2bf (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.0\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored 0.0 points. Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       *  0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 09:27:01 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+> One thing to think about: do we want to keep the name "pick"? If not\r
+> then now is the last sensible time to change it. I don't have any\r
+> better suggestion however.\r
+\r
+There have been some suggestions on irc and I give some pros and cons\r
+\r
+keep the name pick   \r
+tree/treeview        \r
+navigation view\r
+forest\r
+explorer (not serious I think)\r
+zoom\r
+\r
+I think I am happy with any of the first three. At some point later I\r
+might add a flat (unthreaded) version of pick (eg just show the matching\r
+messages in date order, like mutt's unthreaded views); I don't know if we\r
+want a name which will be sensible for that.\r
+\r
+My thoughts on the names: \r
+\r
+"pick" is not a very intuitive name, but it is\r
+established and would do the unthreaded view too.\r
+\r
+"tree" is very intuitive. It might be odd for the unthreaded view. \r
+\r
+"navigation" is intuitive and would be fine for the unthreaded view. It\r
+does seem rather long for prefixes in lisp files. Perhaps use navigation\r
+for the name for documentation but pick or tree as the list prefix?\r
+\r
+The current series no longer applies to master (since Austin's series\r
+touched the pick file). I thought it might be worth settling on a name\r
+before reposting.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r