Re: Improved search speed by 2.5X
authorAustin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:59:19 +0000 (12:59 +1900)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:37:31 +0000 (09:37 -0800)
84/a6ca8916952114ac407e1dd844cc9e844246ee [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/84/a6ca8916952114ac407e1dd844cc9e844246ee b/84/a6ca8916952114ac407e1dd844cc9e844246ee
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3b0c300
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+Return-Path: <amdragon@mit.edu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106B540DBD5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:59:33 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.9\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id QbImmHRa5maI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:59:23 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-1.MIT.EDU\r
+       [18.9.25.12])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0449640DBC8\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:59:22 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-AuditID: 1209190c-b7ba9ae0000009f8-1a-4ce2c67a8917\r
+Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35])\r
+       by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with\r
+       SMTP id 82.B4.02552.A76C2EC4; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:22 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103])\r
+       by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id oAGHxLat021368; \r
+       Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:21 -0500\r
+Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91])\r
+       (authenticated bits=0)\r
+       (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)\r
+       by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id oAGHxKrd000163\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:20 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <amdragon@mit.edu>)\r
+       id 1PIPoN-0005Yx-UG; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:19 -0500\r
+Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:19 -0500\r
+From: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Subject: Re: Improved search speed by 2.5X\r
+Message-ID: <20101116175919.GB2439@mit.edu>\r
+References: <20101116161842.GA2439@mit.edu>\r
+ <87bp5pxl1j.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <87bp5pxl1j.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)\r
+X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:59:33 -0000\r
+\r
+Quoth David Edmondson on Nov 16 at  4:58 pm:\r
+> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:\r
+> > [1] Except for 2 emacs tests that depend on author order.  What order\r
+> > are matched authors *supposed* to be in?\r
+> \r
+> In IRC cworth confirmed that he considered the current behaviour a bug,\r
+> which is to say that the authors should be sorted by first occurrence in\r
+> the thread.\r
+\r
+Ah, perfect.  That's what my patch does most naturally.\r