--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <chevalier.ronny@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2F36DE0A87\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:31:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.536\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.265,\r
+ DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id e1lvP8ZAlT7f for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 19 May 2015 11:31:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com\r
+ [209.85.214.176])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D52856DE021D\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:31:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by obbkp3 with SMTP id kp3so19125689obb.3\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:31:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;\r
+ bh=8QgmI0XqFPfUYDydTUKj2PI2b2LAAGcLK6FBuUBSr9Y=;\r
+ b=dW30K2XdInEEOZGJnCiQ0WDrjIVZbM3x1sJFXvZ14diAtifdlrVuVaDdXJkgR/u9+o\r
+ axqbtxNISway8kM1LWIvkCia08nMI7LUCFLotMHegPboHmSnk1abTAp7YEJnRoJ5xkxM\r
+ pzVDbmkV0CGbYzFKSJtH10R8VBlLmLbm57fICW47d16ZgqGFvKj/4LJdhthNh5H9q6KT\r
+ yrTfRbAihnWkKQ0B7OgJN2Jy3McdXveOLafdEy+uVpfdqxnYFWQEGHtLVglOMWNCN7rs\r
+ Zl1Uobuv1SBpMjiOEnfpgtw1numgm+eFoxPRyWFIm4vGOoEHk3L1/riZx5b7hfr4zox6\r
+ 3gag==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+X-Received: by 10.182.240.135 with SMTP id wa7mr25479735obc.63.1432060289795; \r
+ Tue, 19 May 2015 11:31:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.202.201.130 with HTTP; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:31:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:31:29 +0200\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CABPZE7JWDGnsnS-TFRRTOdSbC09qiRS4gtL=rPP1aXeiQEMbug@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: configure tool\r
+From: Ronny Chevalier <chevalier.ronny@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 18:31:34 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi,\r
+\r
+I'm curious about the reason behind choosing to do your own configure\r
+tool instead of using tools like autotools or cmake?\r
+\r
+Because for me it increases the chance to introduce bugs in the build\r
+system since you are redeveloping tests to know whether a library is\r
+present or not, the system to check if a flag is supported by the\r
+compiler, to check if a function is present, to manage different\r
+platforms,... All of these things are provided by tools like autotools\r
+or cmake.\r
+\r
+For example, I noticed that the part that check if the compiler\r
+options are supported, is not working. Try adding a flag supported by\r
+gcc but not by clang and use clang to compile or vice-versa.\r
+\r
+Thanks\r