Re: bug report: notmuch-hello 'All tags' view
authorJameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:33:08 +0000 (17:33 +2000)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:37:21 +0000 (09:37 -0800)
50/ead159db7fb19e9b1de41cd94f624dc0274313 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/50/ead159db7fb19e9b1de41cd94f624dc0274313 b/50/ead159db7fb19e9b1de41cd94f624dc0274313
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e69951c
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9241340D174\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  2 Nov 2010 14:33:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -4.19\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id Ak70bG2eOSWi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  2 Nov 2010 14:33:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29F140D179\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  2 Nov 2010 14:33:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-67-243-144-42.nyc.res.rr.com\r
+       [67.243.144.42])\r
+       (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+       by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA2LXDNA012670\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:33:13 -0400 (EDT)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+       id 1PDOTg-0002cT-UV; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:33:12 -0400\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>,\r
+       Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: bug report: notmuch-hello 'All tags' view\r
+In-Reply-To: <87oca7mo90.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+References: <87pquogrq7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87lj5bv7sn.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+       <87r5f3mqdn.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+       <87oca7mo90.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:33:08 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <871v73wgvf.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:33:31 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:03:55 +0000, Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@ferns=\r
+eed.info> wrote:\r
+> A call to 'notmuch search-tags' from the command line does indeed return\r
+> an empty string as the first entry for me[1].\r
+>=20\r
+> Does that point to bad data on my part, or has the output of\r
+> 'search-tags' changed recently?\r
+\r
+fwiw, I don't personally get any empty strings in the output of\r
+search-tags (with 0.4).  So I don't think it's anything inherent to that\r
+function.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJM0IOVAAoJEO00zqvie6q8bz0P+wSkCysWhfyWH/QaOX8+iS6d\r
+FTlL+Fy8OuzaOmCR+p6QP7c7CLIjvSbIp7Tv7eX62ixO493dlUtgI52+YEU7q3an\r
+BzQrKdvjaXcfmS8Iv2M1p9R3SBMY7UO2VfbnAcREGreJXT8YGPs32k7ud1a91MVq\r
+3qxE1fI5K2cnKz9GccY3XEVhGn8g2nBzNmtbwzI1FqGrx0dl+k8dJ2+il1k0i2Vi\r
+JDW37Mv1PG4wXM/P2n6Weqq8YC5CNuYGHQZgxgJLJPwN0MaO7zfzyVWXSxl5MHpp\r
+zXhVSykZT2+osCfDunoD1ATtM6HTKlB6rbi5ue70VhbhaOIwUbDHEZajAixx1aEz\r
+nLIM3g6cO7NjpsJubVC2z99EIuFjO7j9StNA9a2+/oPcjfFTfBgJxAcymEL07N93\r
+um01nNKgYuX+B9qqwLwpL/qI2w0eaVwwpRnPvEAMUsNZ3dgJFE3fEAfcXlVwEAXP\r
+A8IDybjlbT/DHfaZhC+VmhEleFoxqnqQtcjuWDDs4SXatGsbUywUbTfrM0Khg9n5\r
+vJezygpdt9VYdrY4ynSK55GbMHcZgxi88H3kty9Hz1xRjVC4gg7fhsC9QBIXNZJs\r
+qyXoVUWatrYCNzbLszByqaNVA74ljiYzhP7l/sr/Vz9m/FQs5ls3yZ2t0CtuQA8L\r
+irarWaQ7K5W00MiEf1Xj\r
+=S0rr\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r