Re: [PATCH 0/2] A bug in the exclude code
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:39:58 +0000 (10:39 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:45:27 +0000 (09:45 -0800)
b4/5cfac2a84d40070a010821cbd0284c6e950f31 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/b4/5cfac2a84d40070a010821cbd0284c6e950f31 b/b4/5cfac2a84d40070a010821cbd0284c6e950f31
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..02c2183
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9E2431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:40:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id lvoK8P68vswm for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:40:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FD3431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:40:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2471132807F;\r
+       Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:40:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C08328070;\r
+       Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 84A55506; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:40:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] A bug in the exclude code\r
+In-Reply-To: <87aa3lsf2y.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <1331551914-28323-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+       <87r4wx7fjz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87aa3lsf2y.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+306~g05d342c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:39:58 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87r4wwiemo.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:40:17 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:07:49 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> Just to emphasise the bug is already present in current master (just\r
+> better hidden because of the defaults). Hence this pair of patches\r
+> (unlike the first one I sent privately) are to current master rather\r
+> than to the exclude the series (though they apply there to to modulo the\r
+> minor change you mention).\r
+\r
+Ok, I see.  I think we really need to see the rest of that patch series\r
+applied to master, though, so if you could send a version compatible\r
+with [0], and in-reply-to [0], that would awesome.\r
+\r
+Thanks again, Mark.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+[0] id:"1330779918-28024-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPX4ZvAAoJEO00zqvie6q8b1QQAImR4y++qG00zBx7Om0mzsqA\r
+opc+D8y03BvDp/wARZoadWZrlH6ZIUsYVSJ7qDE42rUY41RLqVKwMWisdXuxMQlF\r
+ueo50+p7JuxlsnTXk4uVBzSbELpPFKi2gduAWPcDn+WNpjkl8anDxIWuqT7eZm/+\r
+lPsuyCtigcuUhpVG/ELLxx9QRwbY+4NFdFzs7OMyY3oE7Y+TgOmEb1lmDt/TBLMi\r
+gt9SF4OgNdr7lk6XAGDMu/JvUQjcRL/sQiWRfwhLM+dVFNZYc1FlFTGnitdheDOU\r
+8ljaXRV46X2NpxPs5sf8/E3N2DspjMzyUY4OgqpjNcV6yMzHbhpjUcVRtEGiF24S\r
+rP/EhNtn811siTcy3zkHoseQSEtAWNGYk9paPgiET0jVGytdceOwflzdfeuFCMiv\r
+56tcxYWGxCbG32R3kZDT1Au44lBtqZsXPa43fdKUdWcZynjXg0o4lOfgIYk0JZlX\r
+rE29QXg3CG7+V95Vkol08w9zlNqd9Z2w3CqIdbSdHs34Ea3D+J+1s4FcIDnwbox7\r
+QYss2TnffFPmqxD2gTDc8kUnvEeVRay30kIsoPdjmHpG0PMWzSFa7qQinpJuSLA1\r
+qyXDDUlojWYiir94onokcoTMwuJJH58K9AoDuVYIajV9g0k+yIEoDEZZKZn6POuv\r
+QrR4v87HviUDTJApYr6o\r
+=fj0P\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r