Re: gmime2.6 packaging for debian

diff --git a/9f/fdaa7cddf916936d7d33f3df82f1c57b000bcd b/9f/fdaa7cddf916936d7d33f3df82f1c57b000bcd
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9dba853
--- /dev/null
+++ b/9f/fdaa7cddf916936d7d33f3df82f1c57b000bcd
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B727431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 3p88P0l9ptS7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E2C431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3509F2E50E98;\r
+       Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4884B2E50E91;\r
+       Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:49 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id AA3EF557; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:48 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: gmime2.6 packaging for debian\r
+In-Reply-To: <877h0e29ci.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+References: <877h0e29ci.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+131~g7337d96 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:45 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87fwf1sjhe.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:16:53 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:47:57 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.=\r
+net> wrote:\r
+> those of you who run debian might be interested in the gmime2.6\r
+> packaging which i cobbled together for debian from the existing gmime2.4\r
+> packaging:\r
+>=20\r
+>  http://bugs.debian.org/657426\r
+>=20\r
+> Those of you developing notmuch with the gmime 2.6 patchsets might be\r
+> interested in trying it out.  Please let me know of any problems you\r
+> might have with the experimental packaging.\r
+>=20\r
+> It would be good if we could change the build-deps to\r
+>=20\r
+>  libgmime2.6-dev | libgmime2.4-dev\r
+\r
+Hey, folks.  FYI, I build a gmime2.6 debian package from Daniel's new\r
+packaging [0], and it built and installed completely cleanly.  After\r
+reconfiguring notmuch, it picked up the 2.6 library and compiled and\r
+works without issue.\r
+\r
+Thanks so much dkg and everyone who got the compatibility working!\r
+Sounds like official packages might be showing up in experimental soon.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D657426#15\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPIk9eAAoJEO00zqvie6q8MagQAKvMIsKY3pIgGgjYaKXA2tgU\r
+qXLQDH7L46+A/BPFyQpPLrjZRr156UsBrypg6+8eb8g/f/YahxtzQ9fpOeL8ESO/\r
+0TWeeUG21526gvvwAF23hpokfXwk+RkbhOZlE7DH9X81UnUgSlxGMhrNffCaQETm\r
+2RT4sNjMj981/3hI14J3frkNYv+CTo5/C5m3X4pH+qMTiLTEz09S7tPsHCivuVRz\r
+j4V8yrhNdB4Wc3cRWSNcTlXQMitL1k2n5wGr/BogW7PK9sTsK9bB1L1lVec5PqU9\r
+d3DPSpvxDOyfefaPVE4pfl6hI2OAVgrmLtKII/AfZzJ90uEIHdlCo/4xZcMH/jDc\r
+pyVqDpQ80LT6A1RK6oRv6dhXphV+fGoEYGnb5qbUQd/JYhQZNkzqivc5juz+Y8Cb\r
+TMHJj9GIiLfvJvO09Pl8ZcnZaMq7lTnQA1J0zmSdOckWBWmv2z1zQhVFiRHbF7nM\r
+vzermgGeXdQSERySG538oMCjWPgQMH51jcbMQcK1ctdwQ3vowT+lIOwT6tle8XEB\r
+tQEv1YCVDu6pvHvphk9Cn/ZFFTFryMff+dKWwU4n+KK+dKYDT56s+IN8Qur2JMVO\r
+k3gMBuilSMglGKk4V+s7fMrzg076f+X8lUl2cGGTJBfQCdm/vwRzY60+4j2IXSTt\r
+7hESG/GCukFZ5XGAgI0j\r
+=8ZJI\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r