Signed integer overflow is not defined in C, so do not depend on it.
This fixes a problem with GCC 4.4.0 and -O3 where the optimizer would
consider "consumed_bytes > consumed_bytes + bytes" as a constant
expression, and never execute the die()-call.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
input_offset += bytes;
/* make sure off_t is sufficiently large not to wrap */
- if (consumed_bytes > consumed_bytes + bytes)
+ if (signed_add_overflows(consumed_bytes, bytes))
die("pack too large for current definition of off_t");
consumed_bytes += bytes;
}
written_list[nr_written++] = &e->idx;
/* make sure off_t is sufficiently large not to wrap */
- if (*offset > *offset + size)
+ if (signed_add_overflows(*offset, size))
die("pack too large for current definition of off_t");
*offset += size;
return 1;
offset += bytes;
/* make sure off_t is sufficiently large not to wrap */
- if (consumed_bytes > consumed_bytes + bytes)
+ if (signed_add_overflows(consumed_bytes, bytes))
die("pack too large for current definition of off_t");
consumed_bytes += bytes;
}
#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]))
#define bitsizeof(x) (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(x))
+#define maximum_signed_value_of_type(a) \
+ (INTMAX_MAX >> (bitsizeof(intmax_t) - bitsizeof(a)))
+
+/*
+ * Signed integer overflow is undefined in C, so here's a helper macro
+ * to detect if the sum of two integers will overflow.
+ *
+ * Requires: a >= 0, typeof(a) equals typeof(b)
+ */
+#define signed_add_overflows(a, b) \
+ ((b) > maximum_signed_value_of_type(a) - (a))
+
#ifdef __GNUC__
#define TYPEOF(x) (__typeof__(x))
#else