--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D59431FDD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 02:12:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 1.401\r
+X-Spam-Level: *\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id gddc+VnxDFVk for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 5 Sep 2013 02:12:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE306431FDB\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 02:12:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1VHVcD-0007zE-Cv; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:12:40 +0100\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1VHVcC-00081u-SN; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:12:37 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Sebastian Schwarz <seschwar@gmail.com>,\r
+ notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: proposal to remove contrib/notmuch-vim and\r
+ contrib/notmuch-deliver\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <874na0y6x3.fsf@pineapple.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
+References: <87ioygrkhj.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <uaxa9jsncfm.fsf@beesknees.cern.ch>\r
+ <87a9jsriii.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <874na0y6x3.fsf@pineapple.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+269~g01f5508 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:12:36 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87r4d3r5rv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: eb670bd230e51f57adebafb7d62a89c8 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.6\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored 0.6 points. Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails\r
+ * -0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 09:12:48 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+On Wed, 04 Sep 2013, Sebastian Schwarz <seschwar@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> Hello,\r
+>\r
+> On 2013-04-09, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+>> David Belohrad <david@belohrad.ch> writes:\r
+>>\r
+>>> is actually someone using notmuch deliver?\r
+>\r
+> I am using notmuch-deliver with maildrop. This allows me to\r
+> filter and tag based on any header field of the message.\r
+>\r
+>>> [...]\r
+>>\r
+>> notmuch-deliver is replaced by notmuch insert\r
+>\r
+> Because of the way notmuch-insert(1) deals with failure it is\r
+> entirely useless to me. From the manual page:\r
+>\r
+>> This command returns exit status 0 if the message was\r
+>> successfully added to the mail directory, even if the message\r
+>> could not be indexed and added to the notmuch database.\r
+>\r
+> This means that if the index is locked when a message is\r
+> delivered it will not be tagged appropriately. The message will\r
+> still be written to disk. However if you rely on the tags to\r
+> find the message it effectively gets lost.\r
+>\r
+> notmuch-insert(1) should fail if it isn't able to successfully\r
+> perform all of the following three tasks:\r
+>\r
+> - write the message to disk\r
+> - index the message\r
+> - tag the message\r
+>\r
+> It should return with a non-0 exit status and let its caller --\r
+> the MDA or another notmuch client -- handle the failure, since\r
+> notmuch-insert(1) cannot make any guarantees by itself anyway.\r
+> This would usually make an MDA retry delivering the message at a\r
+> later time.\r
+\r
+I think this is a good reason not to remove notmuch-deliver until there\r
+is at least an option to insert to fail in this case. A step in this\r
+direction was made in\r
+id:1374365254-13227-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com but this is not\r
+a complete solution and is not in mainline anyway.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+>\r
+> Regards,\r
+> Sebastian\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
+\r
+\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff