Re: [PATCH] emacs: Fix notmuch-message-mark-replied.
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:40:16 +0000 (11:40 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:47:37 +0000 (09:47 -0800)
3a/ca2bc44b5463cb434b6930b4c842ff1b3c8205 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/3a/ca2bc44b5463cb434b6930b4c842ff1b3c8205 b/3a/ca2bc44b5463cb434b6930b4c842ff1b3c8205
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3e5520f
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1EE431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  4 Jun 2012 11:40:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id H+IQXVuqTY+X for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  4 Jun 2012 11:40:27 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F887431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  4 Jun 2012 11:40:27 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD79328069;\r
+       Mon,  4 Jun 2012 11:40:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-191.ligo.caltech.edu\r
+ [131.215.114.191])    (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by fire-doxen-submit\r
+ (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20152E50BEE; Mon,  4 Jun 2012 11:40:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 980601EA; Mon,  4 Jun 2012 11:40:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Ingo Lohmar <i.lohmar@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Fix notmuch-message-mark-replied.\r
+In-Reply-To: <87vcj8ckzm.fsf@acer.localhost.com>\r
+References: <87vcj8ckzm.fsf@acer.localhost.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+46~gbe36866 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:40:16 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87pq9eapkf.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:40:29 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Sun, Jun 03 2012, Ingo Lohmar <i.lohmar@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> notmuch-message-mark-replied used "apply" to change message tags\r
+> according to notmuch-message-replied-tags after sending a reply.  This\r
+> works if the latter is a single-element list.  But with the recently\r
+> changed format of tag changes, it breaks for multiple-element lists.\r
+> Use "funcall" to properly pass the list of tag changes as a single\r
+> argument.\r
+\r
+I guess this means that we don't have a test for reply tagging in the\r
+emacs UI.  We probably should.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPzQEQAAoJEO00zqvie6q8C8EP/j/e2sDF447ZI4sy/U0G8ORO\r
+twIVP5QFxa73rJ5LSuH1PF8Ti8AlCDodldWB5G7DEm2lAMlmys5RLbfYeQip5j8A\r
+on6hhZHYYRh/CesCNXC129RF5y8RZDf2b34s5+128gZf6glxPHz3oCNKeIjXQMF4\r
+XE68Z29UDhioluofS6MNfbzNRItQB1mX0816p7u8L/C8exORAimi7E0hrb5yW+/+\r
+l5PthWCMUbnyZzfoG0QwGjV+3D00KdYeEnhC+0yE2YmCeYryRkk1RkZo0UCAKmII\r
+uDqOjHxOU0JXL4kOYGmVBE2oBdYvBcEbGCqSBGRVNVDMDyg74W8wwDquFPOk6zRa\r
+eqV5gXJVe3EYmaX/ug4l38aDQwFoJMrEz7zEWqyhgtMMftZaCn6P9yWiKdhMtUuu\r
+Y4yern/o1NrBHSSmGxmDYNiKt0VD8KDaKQCmmT1BZkqPOQi8vtafWCAtVs7jROxR\r
+Vwfxk9lTmMYYNjeaU4wU6iNYr5efPgRFXMDz/zxHp3fl15fixL8JL/8geDnHT+rh\r
+RaKPhJaT9FyCRCPJeerKXoZdVAlPi/wC6w+DpfeHJt04NAm9THz+8yP3wmV86Uz8\r
+9lH8JUQeQkIfJPW0n29sbqEsjeK/Gb8YInQIwiHbRuvfLg/m7meFVFb1AaekNJLU\r
+Bc+onyD/fuwlZLfSY+5w\r
+=EJE/\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r