(no commit message)

diff --git a/doc/bugs/git.pm_should_prune_remote_branches_when_fetching.mdwn b/doc/bugs/git.pm_should_prune_remote_branches_when_fetching.mdwn
index bf68350e3ece2d25e4eb39c023f27d1215787ff9..5b7be1187576a6d6d14950bc04580ce1e85b1ca5 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/git.pm_should_prune_remote_branches_when_fetching.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/git.pm_should_prune_remote_branches_when_fetching.mdwn
@@ -7,3 +7,5 @@ Pruning remote branches can be done automatically with the --prune option to "gi
 > I'll need more information than that before I add extra processing
 > work to the current git commands it uses. I don't see any errors here
 > from obsolete remote branches. --[[Joey]] 
+
+Suppose a remote repository contains a branch named "foo", and you fetch from it.  Then, someone renames that branch to "foo/bar".  The next time you fetch from that repository, you will get an error because the obsolete branch "foo" is blocking the branch "foo/bar" from being created (due to the way git stores refs for branches).  Pruning gets around the problem.  It doesn't really add much overhead to the fetch, and in fact it can *save* overhead since obsolete branches do consume resource (any commits they point to cannot be garbage collected).